Darwinian Evolution: The Undeniable Death of God
However, as Dr. Al Mohler points out in his post from yesterday, it is disingenuous on the part of these advocates to make the claim that one can believe both in a creator and in Darwinian evolution. He basis this on the arguments of leading evolutionary scientist, Daniel C. Dennet, who admits that when it comes to evolution and theism, there is no middle ground. Here's an excerpt:
Read Mohler's full post here.Committed to a radical form of naturalistic materialism, [Daniel] Dennett understands belief in God to be nothing more than an artifact of the evolutionary process. The death of God, Dennett explains, "is a very clear consequence" of Darwinism.
On this point, we should at least be thankful that Dennett is more intellectually honest than many of his evolutionary colleagues. He allows that belief in God may be culturally acceptable, but only insofar as this God has nothing to do with our origins or our lives--past, present, or future.
"One has to understand that God's role has been diminished over the eons," Dennett instructs. "First, we had God . . . making Adam and making every creature with his hands, plucking the rib from Adam and making Eve from that rib. Then we trade that God in for the God who sets evolution in motion. And then you say you don't even need that God--the lawgiver--because if we take these ideas from cosmology seriously then there are other places and other laws and life evolves where it can. So now we no longer have God the lawfinder or God the lawgiver, but just God the master of ceremonies. When God is the master of ceremonies and doesn't actually play any role anymore in the universe, he's sort of diminished and no longer intervenes in any way." Put simply, "the job description for God shrinks."
Labels: David C. Price























0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home