THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED IN THIS BLOG DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF ALL CONTRIBUTORS AND EACH TEAM MEMBER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FACTS AND OPINIONS CONTAINED IN HIS POST.


CLICK FLAGS FOR PAGE TRANSLATION OPTIONS

  Google  
           Search ESPRESSO ROAST Search WWW

Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Off To Boston

I leave later this afternoon for New England where we'll be through the weekend (Marlborough tonight and tomorrow, then downtown Boston Friday through Sunday). We are making our annual pilgrimage to our home-away-from-home. I look forward to visiting old friends and colleagues from our many years there, to be capped off by my wife's company Christmas party Saturday night. That's always a fun black-tie event in one of the ritzy hotels downtown.

As time permits, I am anticipating plenty of opportunity to blog with wireless in our hotel and plenty of great cafes, so hopefully, there will be no beats missed. Maybe I'll post a few pics of the city throughout the trip...who knows. Anyway, until then...be blessed.

Labels:

Ridiculous Item of the Day: Michael Jackson Set To Build Mosque in Bahrain

"His ex-wife says his children are Jewish, his legal opponents allege he invented a drink called Jesus Juice, and now some Middle East media outlets are reporting that pop star Michael Jackson is building a mosque.

According to a front page story in Friday's Bahrain Tribune, the famed singer and 'moonwalker' has pledged an undisclosed sum to build a 'state of the art' mosque, which will stand as an expression of gratitude to the small Gulf state that has served as Jackson's home since his acquittal in June on child molestation charges in a California courtroom."
Appropriate, isn't it, that Michael Jackson made the Moonwalk famous? No matter how much he might look and thinks he's moving forward, he's just keeps moving backwards.

Full story here.

Labels:

Tuesday, November 29, 2005

Extreme Christmas Decorating Makeovers

Hat tip to Short Attention Span for pointing to this amazing Christmas decoration, lighting extravaganza. Anyone want to place odds on how many times the cops are called?

Enjoy.

Labels:

New York Times: Kids Gone Wild

I have spent the last half-hour reading articles in news publications all lamenting the same thing: declining behavior in children. I don't know why it should surprise me to see these kinds of articles since our society has largely given up on the idea of training and disciplining children in order to make them productive individuals in society. What surprises me is more related to the fact that people are actually starting to notice and beginning to open up a dialogue through these kinds of articles that could lead to a healthier approach to raising children.

In the Sunday edition of the New York Times, a surprising article was written about the downward spiral of the behavior of children and the lack of respect they have towards adults. This particular article, entitled "Kids Gone Wild", pointed to a recent survey that revealed "nearly 70 percent of Americans said they believed that people are ruder now than they were 20 or 30 years ago, and that children are among the worst offenders. (As annoyances, they tied with obnoxious cellphone users.)"

Let's think about this for a moment: children are more rude now than they were 20 or 30years ago. That would put us back around, say, 1975 to 1985, right? Now, since we're talking about children's behavior in public, then we're talking about children that are probably around the age of 8-10 years and older which would result in children who were born sometime in or around the 60's, give or take a few years. This would be around the same time that the influence of the "Builder generation" was dwindling and the rise of free love, women's liberation movements, and rebellion became pretty popular. The influence of those who actually believed in such things as discipline, hard work, elder-respect, and personal sacrifice was beginning to lose it's hold on the public mind.

What we have seen of late is the result of the social philosophy of those raised in what many called a "post-Christian" age, meaning an age in which Judeo-Christian values which had, to this point, been the driving force of society, were largely abandoned. People began listening to many different voices, like Dr. Benjamin Spock, who is seen by many as the driving figure of the more permissive attitudes of parents towards children. In fact, some have even said Spock is the primary cause of the rebellious sixties, a point of which is debatable, but according to the popularity of his book (which falls third in all-time sales behind the Bible and Shakespeare), it is not surprising.

These children of the 60's grew up and began influencing culture themselves...and eventually [shudder]...having children of their own. We're talking people like the "material girl" herself, Madonna. Perhaps no one else has had such an influence on a generation as she has. Ironically, as these cultural architects age, they find themselves unable (or unwilling) to consistently live the lifestyle they vociferously advocated:

Even Madonna - her "Papa Don't Preach" years long past - has joined the throng, proclaiming herself a proud "disciplinarian" in a recent issue of the British magazine Harpers & Queen and bragging that, as a mom, she takes a tough line on homework, tidiness and chores: "If you leave your clothes on the floor, they're gone when you come home."

Part of the problem is that too many fathers listened to Madonna and stopped "preaching" to their kids. They became more tolerant of their children's behavior and gave up on teaching them to show respect and did little to earn it.

Unfortunately, people like Madonna learn the lesson long after they have already influenced millions to act just like they did and raise material kids who know nothing of respect and care nothing of civility. Perhaps even more sad is the fact that, through her music and sideshow, she continues to preach the very things she no longer lives.


It seems we have come to a point of publicly complaining about the behavior of children, but not really knowing what to do about it. Funny, this article in the New York Times points to the lack of discipline in children's lives, yet the moment that discipline is carried out by parents or educators, someone cries foul.

We live in a society that is confused. There is a growing number of people who realize that our social structure is out of control, but most feel unable to do anything about it. On the one hand, there are parents who either fill ill-equipped to actually be
parents or are too tired to fight the battles that lead to better kids:

Most parents, Dr. Kindlon said, would like their children to be polite, considerate and well behaved. But they're too tired, worn down by work and personally needy to take up the task of teaching them proper behavior at home.
"We use kids like Prozac," he said. "People don't necessarily feel great about their spouse or their job but the kids are the bright spot in their day. They don't want to muck up that one moment by getting yelled at. They don't want to hurt. They don't want to feel bad. They want to get satisfaction from their kids. They're so precious to us - maybe more than to any generation previously. What gets thrown out the window is limits. It's a lot easier to pick their towel up off the floor than to get them away from the PlayStation to do it."

Of course, then there are the parents (who may be in the majority), who parent according to a prevalent social Darwinist worldview (whether they are aware of it or not). These are the ones who train their kids to compete and win at all costs; it's survival of the fittest out there...a dog-eat-dog world and if you aren't prepared to win, you will be defeated. These are the parents that instill in their children a drive that will take them to the top but leave a whole lot of people...and life...in their wake:

Parenting today is also largely about training children to compete - in school and on the soccer field - and the kinds of attributes they need to be competitive are precisely those that help break down society's civility.
Parents who want their children to succeed more than anything, Dr. Kindlon said, teach them to value and prioritize achievement above all else - including other people.
"We're insane about achievement," he said. "Schoolwork is up 50 percent since 1981, and we're so obsessed with our kids getting into the right school, getting the right grades, we let a lot of things slide. Kids don't do chores at home anymore because there isn't time."

On the other side of the coin are those who are paid to train children. Many are so shaped by the current cultural climate that they, themselves, barely have it together, believing that children should be shown nothing but respect, removing terrible obstacles to their developmental processes like punishment, expectations, and limits to their freedom...ooooh, limits bad; freedom goooood. These are the ones who should quickly be shown the proverbial exit door to public education. Others, though, know what needs to be done and desire to do it, but feel as though their hands are tied and are, therefore, helpless to do little more than watch the next generation slip a little farther down the path of no return:

...other adults, even those who should have authority, are afraid to get involved. "Nobody feels entitled to discipline other people's kids anymore," Dr. Kindlon said. "They don't feel they have the right if they see a kid doing something wrong to step in."
Educators feel helpless, too: Nearly 8 in 10 teachers, according to the 2004 Public Agenda report, said their students were quick to remind them that they had rights or that their parents could sue if they were too harshly disciplined. More than half said they ended up being soft on discipline "because they can't count on parents or schools to support them."
And that, Dr. Rosenfeld said, strikes at the heart of the problem. "Parents are out of control," he said. "We always want to blame the kids, but if there's something wrong with their incivility, it's the way their parents model for them."

Sadly, they are right. Teachers could (and probably would) be sued in many instances in which discipline was handed out to children. Parents are out of control. Kids must be held accountable for their own actions, but it largely stems from their parents, long having abandoned a system of standards deemed a sham by society, who fail to shape the minds and hearts of their children.

What's the moral of this story? All of the talk about the importance of a biblical worldview on this and other blogs is not just a suggestion or option for our culture. We have seen over and over again, in many different places, that when that society was built upon the principles laid out in Scripture and according to a social order with God as its Head, it and it's people thrived. It just does. Likewise, societies built on other systems or that abandon their Christian roots, inevitably fail.

Today, nearly 3 million Americans live in a Country in which that abandonment is nearly complete. Some who are reading this right now currently live in countries where that abandonment has long been completed and could give testimony to the consequences in the lives of their people.

The United States is not completely there yet, but we're making up ground every day.

For more, read Kids Gone Wild in the New York Times, TV, No Homework Can Turn School Suspensions into Vacations in the Washington Post, and Poor Grades Aside, Athletes Get Into College on a $399 Diploma, also in the NY Times.

Labels:

Monday, November 28, 2005

Sweet Snacks Could Be Best Medicine For Stress

Great, another excuse to feed my sweet-tooth:
Researchers from the University of Cincinnati (UC) have found that eating or drinking sweets may decrease the production of the stress-related hormone glucocorticoid.
If you'll excuse me, please, I think I feel a little stress coming on...better go take care of it.

Full article.

Labels:

Indiana Abortion Law Upheld

I read in the Thanksgiving Day edition of the Louisville Courier-Journal that the Indiana Supreme Court has upheld a law requiring counseling for abortion 18 hours before the procedure for young women and, further, it must be done in person.

The issue was over whether or not the requirement places an "undue burden" on women wanting the procedure. After the 4-1 decision, abortion opponents called this "a common-sense victory." Both sides made their voices heard:
Mike Fichter, executive director of Indiana Right to Life, said the court's decision confirms that the waiting period is 'a reasonable and necessary requirement to ensure that women are not rushed or pressured into decisions that will impact their own lives and the lives of their unborn children.

But Betty Cockrum, president of Planned Parenthood of Indiana, said, 'it's a disappointing day for women,' many of whom will now have to travel twice, miss two days of work or find two days of child care to obtain a legal medical procedure.'
Ms. Cockrum makes this "legal medical procedure" sound like a root canal. Of course, to people like Ms. Cockrum, a root canal is preferred over the inconvenience of being responsible for another human being. What this law does, however, is to uphold the demand for counseling that serves to remind young women seeking abortions that, regardless of whether they choose to go through with the abortion or not, they are still responsible for another human being. They will either be responsible for his or her upbringing, or his or her death...responsibility will not go away with a "legal medical procedure."

Ms. Cockrum went on to point out that "we have only five counties out of 92 in Indiana where there are abortion facilities, and it's a pretty big state." Yes, Ms. Cockrum, you make a great point. Why does it not make you ask the question of why there are only five out of 92 counties that offer abortion procedures in your entire state. Could it be that your state doesn't support abortion? Could it be that you are trying to force the people of your state to endorse and embrace something that they realize goes against the very fiber of what it means to be human?

Nah, I didn't think you would get it.


The part about in-person counseling is an issue because out of twenty-three states that require women to undergo a waiting period including counseling, only six require that the counseling be done in person, the others (including my current residence of Kentucky) conduct the counseling over the phone. In my opinion, that is a great weakness since it lacks the personal touch and involvement of caring individuals who can sit eye-to-eye and discuss the issues involved, especially on a subject that will not only determine the fate of a child, but will also change the woman going through with the abortion forever.


The part that I found gratifying about this decision (besides the fact that this establishes precedent for future cases) is that in addition to the opinion given that this law does not violate the Hoosier state's right to privacy, Justice Brent Dickson went a step beyond simply concurring with the opinion to write a separate opinion. In it, he wrote that the court should have "explicitly declare(d) that the Indiana Constitution does not protect any alleged right to abortion."


Dickson went on to say, "In addition, because the challenged statutory pre-abortion requirements not only discourage harm to fetal life, but also protect the health of pregnant women, particularly in light of the risks to women from post-abortion psychological harm, I am convinced that these requirements not only are a proper exercise of legislative power but also are in direct harmony with the furtherance of core values [of the state constitution]."


Good on Justice Dickson. Not only should this be considered common-sense (a rare commodity in society of late), but also a point upon which other elected officials should have the courage to stand. Indiana state representative Eric Koch was right in stating that the abortion debate will continue to rage, but moves like this one go a long way to help settle some of the preliminary issues involving the limits to women's rights and to further the subsequent issue involving the extent to which the rights of unborn children must be taken into consideration.

Labels:

I Devolved

Man, take a few days off from posting and you get smacked. I've devolved to an adorable little rodent. Shees...I always knew this evolution mess was a sham!

UPDATE: There seems to be work going on in the ecosystem, so maybe it's a glitch...funny, I don't feel any different.

UPDATE 2: Well, the ecosystem has changed and, to be honest, I'm glad it has. It took this to realize just how meaningless these distinctions are, though I have put some stock in my "standing" (I can say standing because I'm still a rodent who does stand) in the system. The bottom line is that there is no system that determines blog quality, it is whether or not you are writing quality stuff that people want to read.

I will write the best I can under the circumstances in which I find myself and hope other people want to read it. If so, that's really wonderful. If not, it's out of my control. My goal is to continue to write about real issues from a biblical worldview perspective, point to others doing the same, and point you to items of interest that either have worldview implications or are just fun to read or see. I'll enjoy what I'm doing and leave the response to you. So away with the ecosystem ranking. Thanks TTLB...I think I've evolved.

Labels:

Saturday, November 26, 2005

Good News From That "Quagmire" That Is Iraq

Thought Quotient blogged on some good stats coming out of Iraq:
  • Five million Iraqi students are back in school, with 51 million new Ba’ath-free textbooks in circulation
  • Academics forced into exile under Saddam are coming back to teach in Iraqi universities
  • There are now over 200,000 trained Iraqi security forces personnel
  • The Ministry of Industry has issued 7661 licenses for new businesses
  • A complete rebuilding and renovation of major telecommunications infrastructure
  • A new sewer system is improving health conditions
  • Public Health Centers are bringing family healthcare to Iraqi neighborhoods
All news deemed too good to report...I guess.

Labels:

Friday, November 25, 2005

Liberalism 101: Teacher Gave Anti-Bush Vocab Quiz

BENNINGTON, Vt. — A high school teacher is facing questions from administrators after giving a vocabulary quiz that included digs at President Bush and the extreme right.

Bret Chenkin, a social studies and English teacher at Mount Anthony Union High School, said he gave the quiz to his students several months ago. The quiz asked students to pick the proper words to complete sentences.

One example: "I wish Bush would be (coherent, eschewed) for once during a speech, but there are theories that his everyday diction charms the below-average mind, hence insuring him Republican votes." "Coherent" is the right answer.
More.

Labels:

Thursday, November 24, 2005

Ridiculous Item of the Day: Freegans Fight Waste By Eating Garbage

OK, call me wasteful, but the waste gets wasted. In a move to fight consumer waste (which is not a bad thing to bring to attention), a group in New York insist on eating for free by digging through trash in order to find din-din.
Dinner shared by a group of friends at a well-appointed Greenwich Village apartment featured eggplant Parmesan with a salad of mixed greens and avocado dressing. The guests already had snacked on hors d'oeuvres of smoked mozzarella and crackers.

Not bad considering the diners find their food by digging through garbage. They call themselves "freegans," a play on the words "vegan" vegetarians who avoid all animal products, including dairy, and "free." In an ideological rejection of consumer waste, they only eat food that's been discarded. And in New York City, at least, they never go hungry.
Full story here.

Labels:

One Thing I'm Thankful For Today...

...is religious freedom.

As more and more stories continue to come out regarding countries in which religious freedoms are becoming more and more limited, I am thankful today to live in a country that still values the freedom to worship according to one's own conscience. I have posted on this subject recently (here and here) and today, another story comes out dealing with new limits on religious expression. This time, it's Russia:
The Russian government said that within the coming weeks it may begin tightening control of foreign missionaries and religious organizations.

According to reports and Russian newspapers, the Justice Ministry is considering adopting stricter rules on granting visas to foreign missionaries – an action if effective would lead to the limitation of foreign missionaries in Russia. The government also expressed plans to make the suppression of religious centers easier while causing registration of religious organizations more difficult, according to Zenit News.
Full story here.

Labels:

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

An Espresso Shot [11-23-04]: What Is the "Right" Road to Nirvana?

Buddhism teaches that right thinking and self-control can enable people to achieve nirvana a divine state of peace and release from desire.
Just a quick thought: What constitutes "right" (or "rightness") for a Buddhist and what are the grounds for claiming that any type of thinking is right...or wrong for that matter?

That may be a rhetorical question, though someone actually may feel they have a good response. If you do, I'd really be interested in hearing it.

Happy Thanksgiving!

Labels:

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

Beaming Buddha Boy Brings Big Bucks [UPDATED]

Thousands of pilgrims are pouring into the dense jungle of southern Nepal to worship a 15-year-old boy who has been hailed as a new Buddha.

Devotees say that Ram Bomjon, who is meditating silently beneath a tree, has not eaten or had anything to drink since he sat down at his chosen spot six months ago.

Witnesses say they have seen light emanating from the teenager's forehead.
Six months outside...bald head...light on forehead...sunburn, maybe? An interesting aspect of this story is the results of this event:
A thriving market has grown in the once pristine forest, supplying pilgrims with everything from chewing tobacco and bicycle repairs to incense and religious amulets. The ground is covered with litter.

A fence was built around Ram's tree to prevent pilgrims from prodding him, then a second, and now a third is planned, as well as a bus park, leaving Ram at the center of an ever-growing circle of commerce.
Chewing tobacco, huh? Who would have guessed. Interesting how these so-called worshippers seem to be acting in ways contrary to what Buddhists claim to value, including destroying the harmony of the peaceful forest, littering, and having to be held back by fences so they can't prod their god.

Full story here.

UPDATE [03-22-06]: Many have wondered what happened to the boy. Seems he left...just left. Rather anti-climactic, isn't it? Read the latest from this BBC report.

Labels:

Cheney Gets the "X"



CNN tries to explain why a big 'X' appeared over Vice President Dick Cheney on-air during a recent speech.

Labels:

North Korea is Dark



You may have seen this already, but it is absolutely amazing. This satellite image clearly shows the distinction between two political philosophies at work. North Korea is to the north with South Korea lit up below.


Link: North Korea is Dark

Labels:

Monday, November 21, 2005

Not Evil...Just Different

Relativism is defined as "a theory, especially in ethics or aesthetics, that conceptions of truth and moral values are not absolute but are relative to the persons or groups holding them." Those who hold to certain worldviews such as postmodernism and naturalism adhere to a relativistic view of truth.

Within these worldviews, nothing is really right or wrong. Well, they wouldn't tell you that; they would say that there are certainly things that are "wrong," but if you question them, you'll soon find out that those things that are wrong are things that are wrong to them. It doesn't so much matter whether or not these things are considered universally wrong or even whether anyone else thinks they are wrong. That's not the issue. They are speaking to personal, subjective issues...it is relativism (though if you ask them about environmental issues, women's rights, animal rights, or vegetarianism, they will probably speak in terms of universals).

Perspective is an important word for relativists. After all, it's not so much that things are wrong, universally, they are just of different perspectives and the more we can understand and respect the other perspective, the better off the world will be.


Now, I'm all for understanding another's perspective. Such an understanding is the basis for real dialogue. After all, one cannot even begin to discuss the error in another's view if he does not even understand where that person is coming from. However, to take the next step in saying that all views are legitimate and "right," depending on one's perspective, is illogical and foolish.

I mentioned the Law of Non-contradiction in an earlier post which states that P and not-P cannot both be true at the same time and in the same way. Relativists usually reject the veridity of this law and rarely think through the implications of their views in order to realize that they really don't desire the conclusion of the worldview they are advocating.


Let me give you a good example of the absurdity of which I speak. Michelle Malkin points to a statement made by Chris Matthews, host of one of CNBC's talking head shows, during a speech to a group over the weekend:

The period between 9-11 and (invading) Iraq was not a good time for America. There wasn't a robust discussion of what we were doing," Matthews said."If we stop trying to figure out the other side, we've given up. The person on the other side is not evil. They just have a different perspective.
What Matthews is saying here is that the motivation that leads terrorists who blow themselves up in order to kill large numbers of innocent people is not evil...it is just...different. They have a different perspective on things. They believe that blowing themselves up for the purpose of killing large number of innocent people is just an innocent way to make a political and/or religious statement. This is, of course, absolutely ludicrous.

It really doesn't matter what perspective maniacal terrorists have, what they are doing is universally
wrong...it is evil. I have a strong feeling that Chris Matthews' view would change if he had a family member fall victim to a homicide bomber. He would probably recognize what most other people already know through their God-given conscience. Unfortunately, people like Matthews are too intelligent to bother with mere common sense.

So, why exactly has western culture witnessed a shift away from universal morality? The reason is primarily a rise in postmodernism in which multi-culturalism and relativism have been embraced and the Judeo-Christian foundation upon which western culture was built is considered archaiac and closed-minded. The more tolerant western society becomes of illegitimate and self-defeating worldviews, the more ridiculously impotent our society, in general, and our legal system, in particular, becomes.

Let's look briefly at the implications of such philosophy. If people like Chris Matthews really believe that issues of morality are nothing more than matters of perspective, then any action an individual takes can be argued to be legitimate; simply a matter of perspective. Is this really where we want to go with our society? Do we really want to begin looking at things like homocide bombers as just different ways of self-expression? The thing is, if we adopt Matthews' philosophy (worldview), then our legal system is forever changed, undergoing an irreversible erosion of justice and liberty for all.

No longer will victims of violent crimes be able to rely on a jury's ability to determine the guilt of an individual because he did something "wrong." He was simply acting from a different perspective. Prosecutors will be out of a job because there will be no one to prosecute. As a matter of fact, the words "crime" and "wrong" become devoid of all meaning.

Admittedly, I am painting a picture of society built on the logical foundations of its stated values. Most societies aren't that honest and don't think about what they believe enough to realize that many of their views are completely maniacal. However, even if our culture never becomes a complete anarchy, we will continue to see the erosion of "civil rights" as issues of justice will progressively become based on
societal constructs, most of which are designed and implemented by a small but vocal minority; the whims and wishes of a society rather than on universal principles of morality.

It is wise to look at the different perspectives people have in order to learn what drives them and makes them function in a particular way. It will, however, be the complete and utter destruction of a society if we make the mistake of taking the next step of accepting all views as equally legitimate.

That's my perspective.

Labels:

Sunday, November 20, 2005

Health Crisis in China: A Heart-breaking Situation

How desperate can it possibly get for one to feel the best of all possibilities is to take one's own wife and mother to a morgue to be cremated alive because care is no longer affordable? It is, sadly, the story of one impoverished family in China:
A Chinese peasant woman who suffered a brain haemorrhage was left at the undertakers alive for cremation because her family could no longer afford hospital treatment, state media said on Friday.

She was only saved by the tears in her eyes.

The case is the latest in a series of tragedies illustrating China's stretched health care system and the inability of rural workers to meet spiralling medical costs.

You Guoying, a 47-year-old migrant worker from southwestern Sichuan province, was taken for cremation by her husband and children in Taizhou, eastern Zhejiang province, where she worked, the China Youth Daily said.

Fortunately for You, the undertaker realised she was still alive when he saw her move and tears in her eyes
Full story here.

HT: Pearcey Report

Labels:

Saturday, November 19, 2005

Worldviews Unhinged: U.S. Author Lauds Suicide Bomber

Kurt Vonnegut: an honest liberal.
ONE of the greatest living US writers has praised terrorists as “very brave people” and used drug culture slang to describe the “amazing high” suicide bombers must feel before blowing themselves up.
You really should read the full story here.
HT: LGF.

Labels:

Friday, November 18, 2005

An American Shift: U.S. Is Becoming More Isolationist

MSNBC reports that Americans seem "less enchanted as sole superpower" than we have been in the past. Citing the results of a recent Pew Research Poll (which actually was in two parts, a survey of average citizens and one of the "influentials"), the report states that just four years ago, thirty percent of those surveyed believed that America should "mind its own business internationally and let other countries get along the best they can on their own." Since that time, that number has risen to forty percent, up most sharply among Democrats (55%) and Independents (42%).

I find this desire for isolationism an example of wishful thinking on the part of some short-sighted Americans since September 11 proved it is impossible for the United States to ignore problems and let them go away. They simply won't. They will always find their way upon our shores...now, moreso than ever. I wonder how many lessons like this we must learn before we finally get it.

Even before our most recent reminder, many Americans had taken a similar stance following World War I. The United States, tired from battle and financial difficulties at home, wanted nothing to do with the problems the rest of the world was facing with Adolph Hitler and the maniacal Nazi Party of Germany and the imperialism of Japan. We learned from the events at Pearl Harbor that the world will not leave us alone.

Beyond the fact that we cannot truly become isolationist, we should not want to. We have, as a nation, been given much. We have the means and the foundation upon which much good can be done. We have seen many of the results of what can happen to a people like the Iraqis when the big kids on the block decide to use their powers for good. We see children going to school, women speaking up and taking their place in society, men and women casting votes...real votes that actually count for something. We have been given much and
"to whom much is given, much is required."

Other findings state that many Americans would welcome the emergence of a second super power:
The Council on Foreign Relations said its analysis found "“a striking revival of isolationist sentiment among the general public." In fact, more than a third of Americans (35 percent) said it would be just fine with them if a second superpower were to emerge to challenge U.S. leadership. At the same time, fewer than half of Americans (48 percent)— have a positive opinion of the United Nations, down from 77 percent just before 9/11.
This reflects the fickled nature of the American public wanting their cake and eating it, too. Though many Americans say they would like a second super power, chances are high that it would not be a favorable "partner" in world affairs (as reflected in the United Nations), nor would it likely share American values of freedom and liberty to the same extent. That would lead to more problems than ever. The exception, perhaps, being a country such as Great Britain, though in many respects, much of the British population is as fickled or moreso than the American population. No offense, Britain. I love you, but your people tend to be more quickly impatient with leadership and you are several steps ahead of us in the secularization of society and leadership which always leads to nowhere fast. If there is nothing solid upon which to build the moral direction of a super power, its decisions and value-judgments will eventually become muddled and capricious, caving to the whims of a people.

Most importantly in this report, in my opinion (please read this part!), is the revelation regarding the dichotomy between the views and attitudes of the average citizens and those of the "elites."
This survey demonstrates why we should be very cautious in how much we allow negativism and nay-saying of the "influentials" to shape our thinking:
If anything, the "“influentials"” (the report'’s shorthand for its sample of opinion leaders) are even gloomier about America's world prospects than the public as a whole. For example, 37 percent of Americans as a whole believe the U.S. effort to establish a stable democracy in Iraq will fail, but that view is held by 84 percent of scientists, 71 percent of foreign affairs specialists and 63 percent of journalists.

Meanwhile, while 44 percent of Americans believe the war in Iraq has damaged the international struggle against terrorism, higher percentages in every opinion leader category hold that view, —including military leaders and 82 percent of those who study foreign affairs for a living.

And, except for military leaders, all of the categories of "“influentials"” are more downbeat about prospects for democracy in the Middle East. Even then, only 34 percent of the public (and the same percentage of military leaders) believe it will ever happen; by comparison, only 17 percent of foreign affairs specialists and 14 percent of security experts agree.
We must be careful following the leadership of the "influentials," a group defined by Pew as "journalists, academics, state and local government officials, religious leaders and experts in foreign affairs, national security, science, engineering and the military." Yes, I noticed that religious leaders are in that category, too. I agree that they should be. There are a lot of theological perspectives flying around, all of which must be passed through the filter of Scripture in order to arrive at their level of truth (see my previous post for an example of one "religious authority"--among many--worthy of discounting).

Certainly, getting involved in the world's affairs opens the door for a messy situation. There is always risk and positive results are never a certainty as we experienced in Vietnam. Nevertheless, inaction almost certainly guarantees not only the destruction of our society by those who would exploit are lack of will to fight tyranny, but it would do far worse: it would destroy the moral foundation and desire to do what is right in the world upon which this country was built.


NOTE: Several months ago, I wrote an article on my perspective of war from a biblical worldview. If you are interested, you may read it
here.

Labels:

Showdown in London: Archbishops Threaten Split Over Gay Clergy


In the heat of his current crisis,
Rowan Willams appears to be
calling the Mother Ship
requesting they beam him up.
Unfortunate for us all,
they seem to have denied
him his request.
Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, faced the gravest threat to his authority as leader of the worldwide Anglican communion last night, as nearly half the church's presiding archbishops launched an unprecedented attack on his leadership over the issue of gay clergy.
Full text here.

Labels:

Churches Burned in France. MSM Silent

The Astute Blogger submitted an excellent post today on the silence of the MSM in the wake of a dozen or so churches being torched in the ongoing Muslim riots (oops...did I say Muslim riots?). What are the headlines in the media? THOUSANDS OF CARS CONTINUE TO BURN AS RIOTS THROUGHOUT FRANCE CONTINUE. Here is an excerpt of the post:
One dozen Christian churches were defiled, ransacked and/or torched by rioters in France during the intifada. That's one every other day over the last two weeks. Quite a clip. And during the same period, not a single mosque was torched by the rioters, (whose Muslim-ness has nothing to do with the riots - according to the MSM. And nothing about these targeted attacks against churches has appeared in the MSM, either).

In the old days, when the KKK - (who were like today's islamofascists: a group committed to tyranny and willing to use terror to impose it) - were torching BLACK churches, liberals did not hesitate to join the fight against the KKK. WHY DO THEY STAND AT THE SIDELINES NOW!? WORSE: why do actively work to make it tougher to defeat today's "GLOBAL KKK" the jihadoterrorists!?
Good question. Most of us know the answer, don't we?

Labels:

Thursday, November 17, 2005

Challenges Facing Turkish Christians

In spite of the fact that Turkey passed widespread measures last month to expand civil liberties including freedom of religion, Turkish congregations are still being challenged constantly with the need to remain faithful and strong in the face of "unofficial" oppression.

A Washington Times article reports on the difficulty these Christian congregations are facing and the fact that, though the laws have been passed allowing for free movement of missionaries, legal gatherings, and free evangelism, the Turkish government is clearly using it to its advantage to try and inch its way into the European Union.

The motives of the government would be largely inconsequential, except that these congregations are still receiving ill treatment since the deeply held conviction for most of the country is that to be Turkish is to be Muslim. This, of course, is all that is needed to lead to problems for these Christian groups. The following is an excerpt from the article highlighting some of the challenges these groups face:

To understand the other problem facing Christian congregations...one need only look out a church window into the street, where a police officer dozes in a van while a colleague keeps watch from a plastic chair.
The building has been under guard since last year, when a mentally ill visitor became abusive, unsheathed a knife and tried to set fire to the downstairs meeting room.
Other Turkish congregations have suffered worse. In Ankara in April, gasoline bombs were hurled at the International Protestant Church, causing $10,000 in damage.
Last November, in the southeastern city of Gaziantep, an American missionary was bound and gagged by two assailants claiming to be members of al Qaeda.
Although they didn't follow through on their threats to kill him, they warned that they would come back and finish him off unless he and his family left Turkey immediately.
Missionaries have long been treated with suspicion in Turkey, where rampant conspiracy theories link them to international attempts to divide the country.
The latent mistrust grew into something approaching paranoia in the first half of this year, when news outlets and some members of Turkey's government aroused fears.
On June 11, the staunchly secularist daily Cumhuriyet quoted intelligence sources as saying that evangelists were promoting ethnic divisions by concentrating their efforts on Turkey's Kurds.
The Islamic weekly Aksiyon said in March that 35,000 clandestine congregations were meeting in Turkey. The claim was wildly exaggerated but typical.
Rahsan Ecevit, the secularist wife of a former prime minister, charged in January that missionaries were paying Turks to convert to Christianity.
"We cannot ignore this activity," she said. "At a time we say we are entering the [European Union], we're losing our religion."
Timur Topuz, who attends church in Altintepe, thinks such prejudices stem ultimately from a widespread notion that being Turkish equals being Muslim.
His own grandmother, a Muslim, found it hard to credit his joy at watching Turkey defeat Ukraine in a recent soccer match, he said.
"You, a Christian, happy that Turkey won?" he quoted her as saying.
"People here still haven't realized that nation and religion are different things," he said with a shrug.
It is a good reminder that there are still plenty of places around this globe in which followers of Christ still receive ill treatment, including outright persecutions. It would serve us all well not to get too comfortable with the freedoms we possess. This level of persecution could be coming to a community near you. I wonder how we will respond?

Read full text of "The Cost of Faith"
here.

Labels:

Wednesday, November 16, 2005

Hooray for Tasha Henderson

An Oklahoma mother is taking heat for proactively addressing her daughters failing grades, bad behavior at school, and lack of concern for her education. In order to get 14-year old Coretha's attention, she made her stand on a busy street corner, wearing a placard that read: "I don't do my homework and I act up in school, so my parents are preparing me for my future. Will work for food."

I absolutely applaud this family's concern and love for their child that they will do what it takes to make sure Coretha doesn't end up on the street for real. I'm sure it was humiliating for Coretha, but it should be pointed out that this was not a case of the little girl being dumped off on the street. Tasha Henderson was by her side.


While there were certainly mixed messages from bystanders, including a telephone call to police, citing "psychological abuse," the results have been positive.
Tasha Henderson said her daughter's attendance has been perfect and her behavior has been better since the incident.

Coretha, a soft-spoken girl, acknowledged the punishment was humiliating but said it got her attention. "I won't talk back," she said quietly, hanging her head.

She already has been forced by her parents to give up basketball and track because of slipping grades, and said she hopes to improve in school so she can play next year.
I agree with Marvin Lyle, a 52 year-old bystander who said, "I don't see anything wrong with it. I see the other extreme where parents don't care what the kids do, and at least she wants to help her kid." That's right, Marvin. That there were more parents like the Hendersons.

Unfortunately, too many "professionals" are telling parents that punishment and correction will "damage the child's self-esteem." What a load of pucosh! What damages a child's self-esteem is when he flunks out of school, gets busted for possession and spends the better part of his life in the slammer...all because the parents didn't want to damage his self-esteem.


If more people were like the Hendersons, education would be up, crime would be down, and kids would be much less likely to end up on the streets or in the morgue.

Who gets the last word? Regrettably, it's usually someone like Donald Wertlieb, a professor of child development at the Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Development at Tufts University:
[Wertlieb] warned that such punishment could do extreme emotional damage. He said rewarding positive behavior is more effective.

"The trick is to catch them being good," he said. "It sounds like this mother has not had a chance to catch her child being good or is so upset over seeing her be bad, that's where the focus is."
Certainly, rewarding good behavior is an important part of child-rearing, but the problem is that so many people follow the advice of "experts" like Professor Wertlieb that there is rarely opportunity to "catch them being good" because there is no discipline to encourage it.

"Whoever loves discipline loves knowledge, but he who hates correction is stupid."
Proverbs 12:1 (NIV)


Looks like other bloggers agree.

Labels:

Preach it, Sister! Uh...I mean, Your Highness.

Yesterday at the opening of Britain's General Synod, Queen Elizabeth II laid down the Law of her land and reminded a bunch of relativistic, liberal clergy what it really means to be known by the name, "Christian":
'When so much is in flux… there is a renewed hunger for that which endures and gives meaning. The Christian Church can speak uniquely to that need, for at the heart of our faith stands the conviction that all people, irrespective of race, background or circumstances, can find lasting significance and purpose in the Gospel of Jesus Christ.'
Though it has not been confirmed, it is believed that at these words, Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury, was seen momentarily choking on his own saliva. Read the rest of the story here.

HT: Peter Glover

Labels:

Islam: A Religion of Peace?

At least 450 Christian families have fled the village of Sangla Hill, Nakana district in the Punjab region of Pakistan after an angry mob estimated at around 2,000 Muslims vandalized and set fire to buildings there. The Christian families have not yet returned for fear of further violence.

In a report at www.AsiaNews.It , Qaiser Felix reports that three churches, a nuns' convent, two Catholic schools, the houses of a Protestant pastor and of a parish priest, a girls' hostel, and some Christian homes, were first vandalized and then set on fire by an angry crowd of around 2,000 people in the village of Sangla Hill, Nankana district in Punjab.


The violence took place yesterday at around 10am (local time) and was apparently motivated by an alleged case of blasphemy against the Muslim Koran. Christian News Today
Let's take a little worldview test, here: A good indicator of the character of a people (and a religion) is to see how conflict is handled. It's one thing to say you are a religion of peace, but if the actions don't back it up, there is a real problem with your credibility as a legitimate worldview.

For Christians, some will certainly
say stupid things, but if you blaspheme the Holy Bible, we're going to pretty much leave that up to God to handle that one...we'll keep on loving you. Christians are not going to come and kill your family, burn your car, or eat your dog. We figure He's big enough to take care of Himself if He gets offended. As a matter of fact, He says as much in Deuteronomy 32:35: "It is mine to avenge; I will repay. In due time their foot will slip; their day of disaster is near and their doom rushes upon them."

Let me make sure this is clear. The verse is not speaking directly to Islam in the context, nor am I using it as such. As Paul refers to it later in the New Testament, this verse is applicable to anyone who stands against Christ, including many who claim to be Christians but really are not (Matthew 7:21). When God says He will do something, you can take that to the bank.

This is a reason why it is so important to make sure the worldview we claim to believe in; the story that expains all of reality to us is true and once we are certain it is true, to make sure that we are actually living according to it.

UPDATE: Other reports on the story here.

Labels:

Tuesday, November 15, 2005

A Message From Kurdistan

Click on the image below to view a video message from some of the people many in the world have considered unworthy of defending by way of this "complete failure" of a war in Iraq that Bush "lied" about in order to get the U.S. involved. They have a message for us...at least to the ones who have supported their liberation.

Labels:

Kristol's Response to Bush Speech

Bill Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard, comments on President Bush's recent counter-attack to accusations that he lied to the American people.

HT: Pearcey Report

Labels:

Am I Slow?

OK, that was not an open invitation to speak to my intelligence. A friend told me that Espresso Roast has been loading very slowly on his computer, so I need to know if others are having similar problems. I'm trying to determine if there is a problem with the blog or if this was an isolated occurence. I have noticed that Blogrolling has sometimes slowed down page loads, but don't know if that is a continual problem.

If you don't mind, please give me feedback regarding the speed at which this blog loads on your computer. It will be a big help to me. Thanks!

Labels:

Michael Newdow Files Suit To Remove "In God We Trust"

According to the AFA, atheist activist Michael Newdow is at it again...
Michael Newdow, who has already filed a suit to take "under God" out of the Pledge of Allegiance, is now suing to remove our national motto from our currency.

Newdow told the ACLU of Oklahoma that the national motto on U.S. currency is a violation of the separation of church and state. He is offended because he is an atheist. He wants to use the Federal courts to make his atheism the official religion of America.

Newdow filed in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals which recently ruled that judges, not parents, have the final say in what will be taught school children concerning sex education. These same liberal judges supported Newdow and ruled that the phrase "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance was unconstitutional. That suit was dismissed due to a technicality so Newdow sued again.

The 9th U.S. Circuit is expected to agree with Newdow. The case will then go to the U.S. Supreme Court for final action.
The ridiculous thing is that in this nation, one man (supported by an out-of-control activist court) can completely alter the landscape for a majority of people who both believe in God and desire to see this land maintained upon her judeo-Christian foundation. I encourage you to contact your congressman and let them know you want them to take a stand against this move.

I must say that with this kind of legal action making it's way toward the Supreme Court, I am, again, thankful Senator John Kerry lost his bid for the presidency last year. I can imagine the U.S. Supreme Court might have looked a good deal like the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals by now.

Labels:

Adrian Rogers, Dead at 75

Baptist Press reports that Adrian Rogers, Pastor Emeritus of Bellevue Baptist Church in Memphis, has died at the age of 75 after a battle with colon cancer.

Read statement from Bellevue here.

Labels:

Dare To Tell the Truth

In this relatively new postmodern era we find ourselves in, truth is pretty much considered to be what you make it to be. Ethics are determined according to the situation and morality is a culturally created set of guidelines, primarily decided upon by those strong enough to wield influence and power over others in the community or "tribe," and adopted for the continued survival of the species.

Recently, I had a conversation with a co-worker about issues of truth and reality. With all the people I work with, this guy is the one I most enjoy because, despite his self-description as a "liberal democrat", we have a great deal in common and enjoy deep conversation over important issues.

In this particular conversation, my friend commented that he really enjoyed political science (which was his major in college) because society is essentially determined by the oratory skills of the individual, swaying the opinions of those to whom he spoke. He summarized by stating that "truth was determined by those who could win the argument."

I questioned this theory further with him, asking him if he really believed this was "true" in all of life, to which he responded with a mixed answer of yes and no. Of course, this was a moment of honesty in which he realized that his political and social theory dictated one response, while his life dictated another. I followed by pointing out how many people in the world believe they can make truth into what they want; they can determine what is ethically and morally "right" until such time as they, as C.S. Lewis pointed out, become the victims. When that occurs, absolutes suddenly abound.

Our conversation moved into the area of social issues like abortion, a topic of which I knew his position well since we had discussed it a year ago before, during, and after the election season. He, being a liberal democrat, believed abortion should be legal, a woman is free to make her own decisions about her own body, and people like Roberts, Alito and other conservative judges would do well to leave that hot-button alone. Me? Not so much.

This time, the conversation went differently. Within the context of a discussion of truth, my friend was thinking differently. I was able to talk with him within the framework of absolutes in which, despite our own, personal philosophy in which we have strong views and opinions, there must stand a right decision and a wrong decision; a right answer and a wrong one. We talked about perspectives and opinion and how things change, depending on which viewpoint you are focusing. He came to agree with me that there is, beyond our rhetoric and preferences, something real, something solid.

Though the talking points of this particular topic of abortion is usually related to the woman's opinion and perspective since she is the one who carries the child and it is her body, we were able to talk about it as men. After all, it isn't exclusively a woman's issue at all. I spoke to him as the father of a son who I love dearly. I spoke with him as a man who loves children and lives in a society in which infanticide permeates our society and is very real and very legal, yet there are limits to "choice" and freedom in many other areas of our lives that we all must live with everyday.

He agreed that his perspectives would probably change once he becomes a father and I agreed that I was certain they would, at least to some degree. That seemed to be when the light went off for him: How could something be universally right until something as subjective as one's point of view changes and then, all of a sudden, become wrong?

Anyone with properly working faculties can understand the law of non-contradiction, which says that P and not-P cannot both be true at the same time and in the same way. Yet that is what happens regularly in our postmodern world. People blindly believe that it is possible for one person to believe one thing is right and true while allowing that someone else can embrace the opposite position and both be considered right.

Some have argued that absolute truth is not worth fighting for. I tend to agree. Absolute truth should not be something fought over. Very few conversations ever lead to a positive resolution when they denigrate into a fight. But it is worth reasoning over. It is worth taking the time to have intelligent conversation in which the inconsistencies and contradictions are respectfully discussed, remembering that the person with whom we are speaking is a human being, worthy of the dignity and respect they are due as a intelligent creations of an Intelligent Creator.

I don't buy the methodology of some today who act as though it is better to by-pass the discussion of absolutes and simply work within the structure of an individual's subjectivism. After all, it isn't essential that individuals embrace propositions as universally true, so long as they come to believe and realize that it works for them.

There are two basic problems I see with this "logic": First, it is dishonest. It is dishonest for one to believe that there does exist absolutes yet pawn them off to others as though they are just another set of options that "work." If we believe in objectives, we should have the integrity to stand on them and deal with the messy task of reasoning with individuals regarding their truth. When done lovingly and respectfully, it can not only be a bridge-builder within our society, but it can be a very meaningful conversation for both parties involved in which mutual respect and friendship is built. Secondly, and more practically, is the question of what happens when the individual discovers something else they feel "works" better for them later in another situation?

If we're not honest at the beginning and take the time to make the case for why our beliefs are objectively true, we're doing a major disservice to those who have bought into the lie that all beliefs are equally valid and legit. Amazingly, when approached in an honorable way, even the most diehard relativist will often begin to use their God-given faculties to realize their own irrationality, and, at least, recognize that Truth exists.

Labels:

Monday, November 14, 2005

In Search of Treasure Island

Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for - in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes and the car, and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it. ~ Ellen Goodman
As I read this quote, I am reminded of what Jesus said:
"Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where moth and rust do not destroy, and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also." Matthew 6: 19-20

I have been preparing to speak to the young adults of my church this coming Sunday regarding "Bringing Your Worldview to Life" and have reflected on this very subject. I am reminded how few of us who claim to live according to a biblical worldview actually do.

We claim to follow Christ and His teachings, yet we live according to the rules of the world; we play according to the rules of someone else's game rather than the ones laid out by the master Designer.


Jesus said for us to store up treasures in heaven and to resist storing up earthly fortunes, yet most of the time we are busy trying to amass a comfortable living, desiring to make sure that our family and our lives are at ease. Is there anything wrong with that? Well, not according to the standards we are used to, but according to the biblical standard, the two seem to be at odds with one another.


I'm not insisting that we should seek to live in abject poverty, but it is important--if we are truly seeking to live according to a biblical worldview--to do an honest evaluation and determine what it is we're living for and, exactly, what rule book we're living according to. I suspect we might be surprised at the results. I know I was.

Labels:

Fun in the O.R.: The Surgery Image


I promised that I would post the picture of K’s wrist surgery, so here you go. I must warn you: if you get freaked out easily by these kinds of medical images, you may not want to look (yeah, you’ll have to look now, won’t you?...morbid curiosity).

In case you are wondering, my wife is absolutely OK with having her dissected arm shot around the world. We always enjoy sharing family photos with a few, close friends.

The image is black and white and the paper used made for a little lesser quality image, but the detail is decent enough. If you're a really sicko person and want to play a little game, see if you can count all ten screws holding the plate in place.
See, here at Espresso Roast, we try to provide quality opportunities for fun and games for the whole family. Play it with your kids...spend quality family time together. Play it here online before we publish and put it in one of those "Where's Waldo" kind of books.

Alright, enough of those shananigans. If you’re ready, take a peek.
Here is an x-ray of the finished product.

Labels:

Saturday, November 12, 2005

Coming Monday: The Operation

Any of you remember the '70's game, Operation, where you have to take little white bones and stuff out from the different body parts without setting off the buzzer? If you enjoyed that game, you'll love seeing this.

Today, we received the image of K's wrist surgery in the mail...I should say, her dissection. I have to say, you don't get mail like that very often...thankfully. As promised, for those who like this kind of thing and have been following the saga, I will scan it and post it on Monday. So, check back in. Have a blessed Sunday.

Labels:

Friday, November 11, 2005

Ridiculous Item of the Day: Woman Robs Banks While Talking on the Phone

A young woman robbed four banks in Washington's suburbs without ever interrupting conversations [on] her cell phone, a sheriff's spokesman said on Friday.

In the most recent heist, the woman, with sunglasses casually pushed up on her dark hair and a mobile phone at her ear, walked up to a bank teller in Ashburn, Virginia, on November 4 and opened her purse to show a handgun and a note demanding cash, said Loudoun County sheriff's spokesman Kraig Troxell.

'During the entire sequence, she was on her cell phone,' Troxell said by telephone. 'When we compared it with other robberies that have occurred in the area, we determined she was involved in three other robberies. ... In those cases, she was also on the cell phone.'"

Possible interpretations:
A. This proves that women talk on the phone way too much.
B. This proves that men need to pay better attention to women...
...they obviously know what they're doing.
C. Women are much better multi-taskers.
D. The woman isn't that good at robbing a bank...
...she had to be given step-by-step instructions via phone while doing it.
What do you think?

Full story here.

Labels:

MSM Defends ID?

Hey, somebody in the MSM is actually defending scientists who are having doubts about Darwinism and have taken heat because of it...NPR. Yeah, that's right, National Public Radio. Of all the news organizations that might have come out with a favorable story about Intelligent Design, NPR would probably have been at or near the bottom of my list. Nevertheless, it is true.

A directly related Espresso Roast post here. Also, there are numerous posts on the subject of "Intelligent Design" on Espresso Roast. They can be easily found using the search feature above.

HT: Evolution News

Labels:

Thursday, November 10, 2005

Medical Update [11-10-05]: The Cast Comes Off

Today, my wife had her cast removed. She has been counting down the hours and minutes to this day...literally! If you don't know what I'm talking about, read this, this and this first if you want to be up to speed.

For the past two weeks since surgery, she has had this immovable cast which has a water bladder inside covering the incision area. Attached to the water bladder are two hoses leading to a small cooler full of ice and, essentially, a fountain pump. This is a great invention. The ice water in the cooler was pumped through the bladder, keeping her arm numb, thereby reducing swelling and (the all-important part) minimizing pain.

At first, it was a little shocking when the cast came off today because her arm still looked sort of...well...crooked. As it turns out, that was swelling that will go down, though that was at first of little consolation to my wife who feared she looked like a...and I quote...freak. For those who would like to see this photo, click here. I lovingly call it Karenstein.

After assuring her she didn't, indeed, look like a freak (the Karenstein reference notwithstanding), the shock wore off and rationality returned. Next came the stitches. For a post-stitch removal gander, take a look here (and this photo shows how much trouble we would be in if we had to rely on my wife to thumb a ride). She has now been fitted with a removable cast, giving her much-needed relief and an easier go of it in the shower.

We would like to again thank all of you who have remembered us through this ordeal and sent such nice messages of encouragement. It will be a long road to complete recovery with a great deal of physical therapy to begin in several weeks after the bones completely heal, but we're on that road.

Oh, yeah. I promised you that if I could get a copy of it, I would post a picture that was taken during surgery. Well, I don't have it...but I will. The doctor is going to send a copy to us and I will scan it and post it up. But be fore-warned...it's not pretty...but it is cool.

To be continued...

Labels:

Wednesday, November 09, 2005

Democrats Take Care of Intelligent Design Advocates in Pennsylvania

"Voters came down hard Tuesday on Dover, Pa., school board members who ordered a statement on intelligent design read in biology class, ousting eight Republicans and replacing them with Democrats who want the concept stripped from the science curriculum. "
Full story at CBS news. HT: Pearcey Report

Labels:

Muhammad Ali gets Medal of Freedom

Today, boxing great Muhammad Ali received the Medal of Freedom, the highest honor bestowed on a civilian. Uh, can anybody tell me why?

I guess I just don't get it, but shouldn't such an honor go to people who've done greater things than having been paid an unbelievable sum of money to beat the snot out of other people all the while declaring, "I
am the greatest"?

...the things we value.

Labels:

The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe...and a little five year-old boy

C. S. Lewis has, for over fifteen years, been one of my very favorite authors. From his systematic approach to the Faith in Mere Christianity to his gut-wrenching struggle with death in A Grief Observed, I have always found Lewis to be understandable, honest, and...well, like a friend. Through his writing, you can almost get right up beside him and sit and listen to him talk and feel that he wouldn't mind the intrusion in the slightest.

Having read just about everything he ever wrote, I realized recently that everything I had read was all non-fiction. I know, crazy, isn't it? I had never read any of his works of fiction. No Space Trilogy. No The Horse and His Boy. No Chronicles of Narnia...nothin'.

So, recently (actually before the hype of the new movie began to resonate), I thought about getting the first book of the
Narnia series, The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe, and reading out loud in the evenings as a family. I figured it would be a great way to break away from the norm, make sure the T.V. is off, and spend some quality time as a family participating in something that would not only create a sense of togetherness, but also allow us to engage in a work that could be a launching pad into a deeper journey of faith.

The question was going to be whether my little five year-old boy, who up to this point has only had short books full of pictures read to him, was going to take to this new venture. Could he sit long enough to make it through a chapter? Would he be able to tolerate a story without pictures? Would he be able to follow the plot and create the mental pictures necessary to be able to make it both understandable and enjoyable for him? All of these questions were swirling around in our minds as we decided if he was old enough for us to try something of this magnitude. Finally, my wife and I decided we'd go for it.


He absolutely loved the story. He hung onto every word, asking plenty of questions as went along...several times...nearly constantly at first, but not only grasped the concept of the story itself, but also understood much of the theological undertones. There was a single picture at the beginning of each chapter (which, generally we read one per night, though we all got into so much we often read two and three chapters at different parts of the day), and that picture was enough to spark his imagination. As I would ask every so often, "Can you see it? Do you have a picture in your mind?" He always responded in the affirmative and fell in love with Lucy, Peter, and even Edmund...he was very concerned about Edmund. Of course, though, his favorite was Aslan (mine, too). I was happy he loved Aslan and enjoyed talking to him about the connection Aslan has with Christ, Himself.


I don't know if you have children or if you have an opportunity to read together with a young child, but if so, take the opportunity to dig into deeper stories than
Thomas the Tank or Bob the Builder. It is an incredibly rich experience and none of us can wait to dive into the second book.

Labels:

More Christian Persecution in Jakarta

There has been more Christian bloodshed in Jakarta, in the same town where the three young girls were beheaded recently by Muslims because they were Christians:
Two more girls were shot in the head in the evening of November 8 in Poso, in central Sulawesi-- a province marred by months of bloodshed, as Muslims have clashed with Christians. The two girls are in critical condition in a local hospital.

Labels:

Tuesday, November 08, 2005

Washington Times: Chronicling C. S. Lewis

There's a good article here in the Washington Times on C. S. Lewis.

Labels:

Joel Osteen preaches...Joel Osteen

People will be hard-pressed to find the message of the Gospel of Christ in the preaching of mega-church pastor, Joel Osteen. In his top-selling book, Your Best Life Now, one can easily find a mix of self-help and health-and-wealth gospel. What is difficult to find in the book as in his weekly sermons at Lakewood Church in Houston (where you can "discover the champion in you") is...Jesus.

Many have been calling attention to the absense of the Gospel in Osteen's messages. Now, it is pretty clear what message those who listen to Osteen come away with. Away with the tired, old WWJD (what would Jesus do?) No, we're members of the new church embracing a new meaning for the universal Christian symbol:
I.W.J.O. Get yours today!

Good job, Joel. You're getting the message out loud and clear.

HT: Keith Plummer of The Christian Mind

Labels:

Espresso Roast Listening Room Updated

The Listening Room (located on the right sidebar) has been updated with new audio content. Resources have been added related to apologetics, worldviews, and theology. Hope you enjoy and find it helpful. If you know of additional content that would be useful, please let me know.

Labels:

Kansas Adopts New Science Standards

Good news out of Kansas. This press release from the Discovery Institute:
SEATTLEKansas today became the fifth state in the nation to adopt science standards that encourage students to learn both the strengths and weaknesses of Darwinian evolution.

“This is a big victory for the students of Kansas, providing them with full-disclosure of the scientific debate about Darwinism going on between scientists and in the scientific literature, so we’re very pleased” said Casey Luskin, program officer for public policy and legal affairs with Discovery Institute’s Center for Science & Culture.

The science standards adopted in Kansas emphasize that they do not include teaching of intelligent design. Instead they require students to learn the scientific evidence for and against Darwinian evolution. Discovery Institute strongly believes that schools should require only that the scientific evidence for and against neo-Darwinism be taught, while not infringing on the academic freedom of teachers to present appropriate information about intelligent design if they choose.

“In every case Darwinists have tried to say there is no controversy and in every case they were wrong,” said Luskin. “Kansas now joins Ohio and three other states in recognizing that there is a legitimate scientific controversy and there are credible scientific criticisms of evolution.”

In 2002, Ohio became the first state to require students to learn about scientific evidence critical of neo-Darwinian theory, adopting a benchmark that says students should know "how scientists continue to investigate and critically analyze aspects of evolutionary theory." Pennsylvania, Minnesota and New Mexico have also adopted similar standards calling for critical analysis of the scientific evidence both for and against neo-Darwinian theory, as have individual school districts around the country.

Labels:

Bush to Blame...again.

Hey, here's a shocker...some libs think Bush is to blame for the Parisian riots. Go figure.

ht: LGF

Labels:

Monday, November 07, 2005

Legislating From the Bench: 9th Circuit Has Done it Again

Once again, the infamous 9th U.S. Circuit of Appeals has passed legislation stating that there are no "fundamental right of parents to be the exclusive provider of information regarding sexual matters to their children...Parents have no due process or privacy right to override the determinations of public schools as to the information to which their children will be exposed while enrolled as students."

Frankly, I barely trust public schools to teach my child math, much less matters of sexual education. Unfortunately, precedent is being set as this out-of-control court rules again in favor of the liberal left agenda (Nancy Pelosi
quickly defended the left wing court when conservatives attempted to split it up...she knows she has much to lose).

Children in the 1st, 3rd and 5th grades in a California school district were administered a survey in which they were asked to respond to what many, including myself, consider highly inappropriate subject-matter:
Touching my private parts too much

Washing myself because I feel dirty on the inside

Not trusting people because they might want sex

Getting scared or upset when I think about sex

Having sex feelings in my body

Can't stop thinking about sex

Getting upset when people talk about sex
Because of the actions of this maverick court, the rights of parents in raising their own children are being eroded away right in front of them with, it would seem, very little they can do about it. As a father and a minister, I have always been an advocate for maintaining a positive influence in public schools through the presence of Christian children. However, with actions such as this, I am having to rethink this position very seriously. The day may come when private school or homeschooling is not only the best option (it very well may be already), but the only option for parents who are serious about raising their children the way they deem appropriate.

Read Sharon Hughes blog, Veritas, for more.

Labels:

Saturday, November 05, 2005

Ridiculous Item of the Day: Man Sues After Using Glue-Covered Toilet

"BOULDER, Colo. - Home Depot was sued by a shopper who claims he got stuck to a restroom toilet seat because a prankster had smeared it with glue.

Bob Dougherty, 57, accused employees of ignoring his cries for help for about 15 minutes because they thought he was kidding.
OK, who the heck sits down on a public toilet without at least wiping the seat! Dude, that's disgusting. What I want to know is how long he sat there trying to get up the nerve to call for help before he actually did. The guy obviously didn't take the humiliation sitting down:
'They left me there, going through all that stress,' Dougherty told The (Boulder) Daily Camera. 'They just let me rot.'"
Well, the man wasn't actually left to rot. According to the report, the paramedics did come about fifteen minutes later, unbolted the toilet and carried the man through the store on his can.

No need to fret though, Dougherty was fine and the seat was "separated from his skin, leaving abrasions." Apparently, the man was left with only ring around the bottom.

Yahoo News

Labels:

Friday, November 04, 2005

Espresso Roast Turns One Today

Today is my one year anniversary as a blogger…and what a year it has been.  I had no idea how consuming this little thing would become when I ventured into the blogosphere, nor how much I would learn.  Of course, as any one year old, I feel as though, in many ways, I am just now learning to walk.

As I look back over the past year, at various posts, interactions, reactions, etc., I am able to see the process of growth and development in my thinking, my learning, and sometimes my un-learning.  There is nothing like documenting a year of thoughts and comments on issues to help you see your progress in life.

For those of you who have emailed me to tell me that you have made Espresso Roast a tiny part of your day, I am sincerely grateful.  I do not take it lightly that you think this as worthy of even the slightest amount of your time.  I also want to take this opportunity to thank you, my fellow bloggers, who challenge me and make me think with your own brand of commentary and insights into life that have led to much of the growth I’ve experienced over this past year.  

You’ve encouraged my critical thinking, often causing me to think deeply over long-held ideas or opinions.  It’s become hard to go a day without finding out what you are thinking or dealing with as I make my way through my list of feeds.  

One of the best things I like about the blogosphere is the sense of comradery.  In such a dog-eat-dog world where everyone wants the spotlight on themselves and people are trying to claw their way to the top, this is a place where we go out of our way to make sure that everybody is reading everyone else’s blogs.  I think that’s very cool.

Well, who knows where all of this will go?  Though Espresso Roast is just a passing bleep on the vast universe of cyberspace, it has been quite a blessing to be able to, as one blogging buddy likes to say, vomit my thoughts onto the screen and see what I have been eating…yeah, that’s absolutely disgusting, isn’t it?  Actually that last part was original but it is probably the best analogy for what often happens.  OK, enough of that.

I suppose I have covered everything except to thank the Academy for this award, so I will shut up now before the music starts.  But this has been a cool ride and I hope God will bless me with many more years of living right here in the blogosphere.

Labels:

Thursday, November 03, 2005

An Espresso Shot [11-03-05]: The Coming of a Prince...Sort of

Normally, I catch Al Mohler's well-written daily articles when they're posted, but not this one. Thankfully, my friend, Peter, highlighted it over at Wires From the Bunker and I didn't miss it altogether. You shouldn't, either. In this article, Mohler explains the postmodern tendencies of the "eccentric" monarch who is Prince Charles of Wales, and points out his desire to be "a defender of faith rather than Defender of the Faith" as British royalty used to consider themselves:
'I personally would rather see it as Defender of Faith, not the Faith, because
it [Defender of the Faith] means just one particular interpretation of the
Faith, which I think is sometimes something that causes a deal of problem,' said
the Prince. Viewers of the interview could be forgiven for failing to understand
the Prince's bumbling articulation. After all, what is 'sometimes something that
causes a deal of a problem' supposed to mean?
Mohler points out part of Charles' mission to the states as being to set America aright regarding her view and approach to Muslim influences:
Now, Prince Charles intends to chide President George W. Bush concerning what
the Prince sees as America's lack of tolerance for Islam. According to The
Telegraph [London], the Prince "has voiced private concerns over Washington's
'confrontational' approach to Muslim countries and its failure to appreciate
what he regards as Islam's strengths."


Of all the people to be lecturing on morality, Prince Charles ranks right up there with the likes of Madonna and Bill Clinton. The entire article is well worth the read
here.

Labels:

Tuesday, November 01, 2005

Doing The Work

My brother just sent me this great photo. You'll probably have to click on the image for a bigger version, but read the patch under the American flag on his sleeve.


Labels:

That's Not Just a Mirage Up Ahead: Finding Hope In the Desert

I suppose I don't frequently post this sort of personal stuff, but the following is where I am right now. Part of the purpose of this blog is not just textbook information, or analysis of other's experiences or comments, but also to serve as an honest reflection of my own life, hoping that somewhere along the way, someone else might either be encouraged, challenged, or strengthened in their own life through these writings.

To begin with, I think we all want our lives to mean something. Even those who say they believe there is no real meaning in life still want meaning...and believe, deep down, that there is. We want our lives to count and we all live our lives as if they do (or at least can and should). For those of us who know there is meaning and desire to find that by following Jesus Christ, the author and giver of meaning, we want those moments of inspiration; of feeling that we are right in the middle of God's plan and that He is doing great things.

Unfortunately, those
feelings are not always there. The moments of inspiration seem dried up and we even wonder what God is doing with us. In one sense, that is where I am right now. I graduated in May with my second Masters and, at this point, still have no idea what is next for me and my family. I have applied for various positions, but don't really feel good about moving in those directions. I haven't felt a particular call to a particular thing yet. It would be easy to simply drift; to float from one day to the next, maybe even getting frustrated, feeling God has "let me down" by not giving me a place of service by now. I may feel as though what I am doing right now--working a "regular", non-career type job, taking care of my family, participating through my church, and writing on this blog--is worthless. Maybe it isn't anything special in the grand scheme of things. Then I'm reminded that God's ways are not my ways. His timing is not mine. It is not the moments of great inspiration that are the important things in life, but the faithfulness and persistence in the mundane that count a great deal in the grand economy of God.

I came across this reading from a book called
My Utmost For His Highest by Oswald Chambers that I had read and saved from back in May. Maybe it can encourage you, as it did me, if you've recently gone through similar experiences.

Faith -- Not Emotion



We walk by faith, not by sight —2 Corinthians 5:7



For a while, we are fully aware of God's concern for us. But then, when God begins to use us in His work, we begin to take on a pitiful look and talk only of our trials and difficulties. And all the while God is trying to make us do our work as hidden people who are not in the spotlight. None of us would be hidden spiritually if we could help it. Can we do our work when it seems that God has sealed up heaven? Some of us always want to be brightly illuminated saints with golden halos and with the continual glow of inspiration, and to have other saints of God dealing with us all the time. A self-assured saint is of no value to God. He is abnormal, unfit for daily life, and completely unlike God. We are here, not as immature angels, but as men and women, to do the work of this world. And we are to do it with an infinitely greater power to withstand the struggle because we have been born from above.

If we continually try to bring back those exceptional moments of inspiration, it is a sign that it is not God we want. We are becoming obsessed with the moments when God did come and speak with us, and we are insisting that He do it again. But what God wants us to do is to "walk by faith." How many of us have set ourselves aside as if to say, "I cannot do anything else until God appears to me"? He will never do it. We will have to get up on our own, without any inspiration and without any sudden touch from God. Then comes our surprise and we find ourselves exclaiming, "Why, He was there all the time, and I never knew it!" Never live for those exceptional moments -- they are surprises. God will give us His touches of inspiration only when He sees that we are not in danger of being led away by them. We must never consider our moments of inspiration as the standard way of life -- our work is our standard.

Labels:

Pearcey Report

My Ecosystem Details

© 2007 Espresso Roast Blog - All Rights Reserved