THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED IN THIS BLOG DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF ALL CONTRIBUTORS AND EACH TEAM MEMBER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FACTS AND OPINIONS CONTAINED IN HIS POST.


CLICK FLAGS FOR PAGE TRANSLATION OPTIONS

  Google  
           Search ESPRESSO ROAST Search WWW

Wednesday, June 29, 2005

The Importance of Local Politics: Rule change aids Planned Parenthood

I've heard it said that it is less important regarding political ideology of local city government officials than on the state or national level. The rationale is that local officials rarely ever deal with social issues like abortion or simlar devisive issues. Well, the Louisville Courier-Journal reports on a scenario in Louisville that proves that oh so wrong.

Louisville Mayor Jerry Abramson has figured a way to award government grants to Planned Parenthood without the approval of City Council by changing the wording on the city budget. Republicans foolishly let it pass.
The new wording allows the mayor's office to approve any contract that goes to the lowest bidder. It eliminates a requirement that the Metro Council approve all contracts exceeding $100,000.

Democrats say that Republicans, who are trying to eliminate the city's $160,000 contract with Planned Parenthood, agreed to the change.

But Republican caucus leader Kelly Downard said he is "concerned that we have been double-dealt," and he said Abramson should bring the contract to the council for approval.

Downard said he agreed to the wording after a brief discussion with Democrat Jim King, but he said he never believed that Abramson would use it to bypass Metro Council.
It's a tough lesson to learn, but the republican councilman was naive to believe otherwise.
"The federal program that funds the city contract with Planned Parenthood, called Title X, was begun nearly 30 years ago to ensure that all women, no matter their income, have access to family planning and other services.

The program provides a grant through metro government, paying Planned Parenthood and other agencies $40 for each client they treat, said Health Director Adewale Troutman.

Under the Title X program, counseling can't steer women to an abortion, but the counselors, if asked, must tell women that abortion is an option."
How many of us are naive enough to think they won't lead their clients to ask the question? Local politics don't matter? Think again.

Labels:

Time to Google Earth

Google has released a really cool new program that uses global satellite mapping technology to spice up finding directions. Of course, you don't need to find directions in order to enjoy it. Use it to start out in space and fly down onto a satellite photo of the Eiffel Tower or Big Ben or the Washington Monument. I spent some time zooming in on all the old houses I've lived in including where I live now.

Finding directions has never been cooler as the software uses these global images to map out your route, overlaying every leg of the trip with turn-by-turn directions. Need a bite to eat on the way? No prob. Overlay any number of options including places to eat, sleep, sip coffee, and more. This is definitely worth checking out. Download the program here at Google's main web page.

Labels:

Tuesday, June 28, 2005

It's a wacky, wacky world: So Bush Sr. and Clinton really like each other...oh, my.

Proof that people can maintain ideological differences and still like each other...A good lesson for the rest of us.

Labels:

The Pursuit of Justice

I was reading yesterday's section from My Utmost For His Highest this morning and began contemplating an important principle that could radically alter society if we took it seriously. Oswald Chambers encouraged his readers to "never look for justice, but never cease to give it."

I almost passed right over that without so much as a second thought, but was taken aback by its simplicity, yet is profundity. What would happen if each of us began to take seriously those words? Living in an entitlement society, it is hard to even fathom.

The American welfare system has produced generations of people who are in great need, but have no idea how to get out of the mire in which they find themselves. They are largely denied the tools and the incentive needed to succeed. Instead, they are provided a "hand out" that keeps them going until time for the next "hand out." It's what they expect; it's what society owes them.

The American legal system has produced generations who believe they are entitled to as much as they can get through law suits and frivolous litigation. If someone does the slightest thing against you, whether that be a dent in your fender or a denial of your "civil rights," take them to court and squeeze as much out of them as is possible. It's your right!

The American economic system has produced generations who believe that to get more and accumulate the greatest amount of wealth is the height of virtue. Sometimes that can only happen by cutting edges, cutting costs, cutting services, or cutting benefits. But to get the most possible is your right...live and let live...the one with the most toys wins. Justice? Sure...it's my right.


I'm just musing out loud right now, really. But I just wonder what would happen if each of us, regardless of our particular nationality (as each tends to produce much of the same entitlements) determined to forego our "rights" in exchange for dishing it out to others as often and as much as we could. Seems to me that if each of us were seeking to demonstrate justice to those around us instead of seeking our own, we would inevitably find ourselves being treated justly, would we not? I believe that was the idea behind Jesus' instruction to treat others the way you want to be treated.


I admit that I am speaking in an idealistic way, though I assure you I'm not advocating the creation of some type of utopian society on earth. It cannot happen. However, if you and I could determine to adopt this type of attitude, there is no doubt that we could affect a large number of people around us and work against the tide of injustice we see everyday.

It starts with a mindset and determination to make the change. Maybe then real changes could be made to help those with little means to help themselves. Maybe then we would deny some of our own rights and comforts in order to support those individuals and organizations who are working hard at alleviating suffering for those most vulnerable in our societies.


I have to provide the context of Chambers' statement for those of you who are disciples of Christ. For us, it is not really even an option to do otherwise, though we often neglect this responsibility.
The Sermon on the Mount indicates that when we are on Jesus Christ's errands, there is no time to stand up for ourselves. Jesus says, in effect, Do not be bothered with whether you are being justly dealt with or not. To look for justice is a sign of deflection for devotion from Him....The most devout among us are atheistic in this connection; we do not believe God, we enthrone common sense and tack the name of God onto it. We do lean to our own understanding, instead of trusting God with all our hearts.
Perhaps we'll never really change the world. Maybe we'll never see our societies really embrace these principles, but we could change our world. We can make changes so that the way we live our lives will make a tremendous impact for good in the lives of the people we come in contact with. And who knows, maybe it just might rub off a little.

Labels:

Monday, June 27, 2005

Doggone...but not for long: Scientists resuscitate "dead" dogs.

A really crazy development has occurred in that scientists have successfully revived dogs that have been clinically dead for hours (though if this picture is any indication, the dogs are not happy about it). How could this happen, you say.
Pittsburgh's Safar Centre for Resuscitation Research has developed a technique in which subject's veins are drained of blood and filled with an ice-cold salt solution.

The animals are considered scientifically dead, as they stop breathing and have no heartbeat or brain activity.

But three hours later, their blood is replaced and the zombie dogs are brought back to life with an electric shock.

According to the report, plans are to eventually be able to use the procedure on humans, not to preserve them for years later, but rather for a few hours to help save patients who have lost considerable amounts of blood as in combat and injuries in which large amounts of blood is lost.

The tests on the dogs have indicated that they are perfectly normal after the procedure with no brain damage detected. The good side of this is that it may be a technique that can be used to save many victims who would have otherwise died from their wounds. The downside is that this will only fuel the cryogenics fire. Of course, they're wasting their time (and money)...the only way to beat death is to follow the One who overcame it.

[full story here.]

HT: Drudge

Labels:

Sunday, June 26, 2005

I Got Tagged

Soldado De Oracion has tagged me for a book meme. I have included the following answers to the questions regarding important books to me. As with all the others who have been tagged, the Bible is in a class to itself, so it is a given that it is an important book to me.

Total number of books ever owned: Approximately 1200

Last book bought: Foolishness to the Greeks by Leslie Newbigin

Last book read: Last book completed is Unstoppable Force by Erwin McManus. Actively reading A Voice in the Wind by Francine Rivers and Virtual Church by Peter Glover

Five Books that Meant a lot to me: Tough...I could have listed a bunch more than five.
Mere Christianity and A Grief Observed by C.S. Lewis (sorry, it was a tie)
A Severe Mercy by Sheldon Vanauken
Roaring Lambs by Bob Briner
What on Earth are We Doing? by John Fischer
The Five Love Languages by Gary Chapman

Thanks for the tag.

Labels:

Saturday, June 25, 2005

Specter's Idea of Making Life More Valuable

Here is a really good article I encourage you to read that points out the importance of examining the principles behind actions. Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter (R) thinks that since frozen embryos are going to die anyway, why not use 'em for research. In the article, Paul Greeburg explains how this short-sighted line of thinking can (and has) lead to all forms of inhuman actions:
For some reason - can't imagine why - listening to the senator brought back the reasoning that German doctors once used to justify their experiments on concentration camp inmates. They were going to die anyway; why just throw them away?
It is this kind of logic behind the actions that is scary. If something is going to be "wasted," why let it? Why not use the doomed individuals to advance our knowledge or to benefit mankind in some other way. Greenburg follows this line of thinking to its logical conclusions:
For the senator's logic has all kinds of possibilities. Think of the prisoners on Death Row. Or comatose patients in nursing homes who are not living so much as waiting to die. And what good are the Terri Schiavos doing anybody? Why not experiment on them, too? Or just use them for parts? They're just hanging around. Like those tiny embryos.

In another age, when the Rev. Jonathan Swift made a modest proposal to combat famine in Ireland - why not consume the next generation? - his essay was called a masterful satire.

Now it reads like today's news.
To say that ethical decisions are far-reaching is an understatement. Precedents can be set that can effect countless individuals in ways never before imagined. It is important that we not make these types of decisions based on pragmatism, but on the notion that human life has intrinsic value regardless of its usefulness. Anything short of this will always lead to the destruction of someone for a "worthy cause." Who's next?

HT: WorldMag

Labels:

Thursday, June 23, 2005

Steve Austin, move over...introducing the new bionic man.

Here is an amazing story of a man who had both arms amputated after an electrical accident, now operating prosthetics with his brain. When the man thinks about closing his hands, they close. When he thinks "open hand," it opens.

At some point of the development, according to a report, "tiny sensors in the fingertips will allow [the patient] to feel texture and temperature. Doctors at the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago said the breakthrough could change the lives of amputees, patients with spinal cord injuries and stroke victims."

This is a truly exceptional development that offers wonderful hope to the countless people who have experienced similar losses. Unfortunately, the prices tag is expected to be around $6 million. (For you 70's TV buffs, that does, coincidentally, make him a real "$6 Million Man")
[more]

Labels:

Will work for food

It is not my normal practice to use this blog for personal advertisement...well, today I am.

Most of you probably know (if you looked to the left under my picture) that I recently completed a Master of Theology degree at Southern Seminary. You probably don't know that the reason I originally attended SBTS was to pursue a PhD and then teach at a college to which I had been offered a position. To make a long story short, toward the end of the ThM but before it was time to submit my application for PhD (we're talking this past March), my family and I determined that teaching full time was not the direction we should be going, so I withdrew my application.

The result is that our plans have changed drastically, leaving us with a great deal of uncertainty regarding what is next. As we look for open doors, I would ask any of you who stop in here who may know of any available church-related positions in the areas of college/career/young adult ministries, Missions Pastor, Pastor/Associate Pastor, or maybe (hear that, Joe Thorn? I said maybe) church planting again, to please let me know. I'm open to many different areas within the church as well as to parachurch ministries. I greatly appreciate it!

Labels:

An Espresso Shot: Religion and Medicine.

Here is a quick link to an interesting story on religion and medicine.

A study from the University of Chicago, being billed as the first to examine physicians' religious beliefs, has found that 55 percent of doctors say their religion influences how they practice medicine.

In addition, 76 percent of doctors said they believe in God and 59 percent believe in some sort of afterlife, putting them more in line with their patients than the rest of the scientific community. [more]

Labels:

Wednesday, June 22, 2005

We have baby

Well, that was quick...my niece just delivered a healthy 9lbs 2ounce little girl and everybody's great. Praise God.

Thanks, anyway.

OK, I'm really heading out this time...

...really.

UPDATE: 7 pounds 2 ounces, not 9 pounds...sheesh!

Labels:

On the road again

Wrapping up here at the SBC Convention...sounds weird, huh? Southern Baptist Convention Convention. Whatever. It's been a good week. Can you tell I'm tired?

One quick parting request: My nephew and niece are in the throws of child-birth and it hasn't been easy. The baby's heart stopped beating for a minute early this morning and my niece has been in labor now for about 20 hours and is exhausted. She was just taken in for a C-section. Those of you who are pray-ers, please do. Thanks!
OK...time to hit the highway!

Labels:

SIGNS of the Times: the SBC's message to Nashville

I was driving through Nashville last night with a friend, and we happened to pass by one of those SBC billboards that read, “Jesus Cares…and so do Southern Baptists.” We chatted a little about the impact of that on the city and the motivation behind it. My first thought was that it’s going to take a whole lot more than a billboard to communicate that to Nashville or anywhere else. More importantly, though, it occurred to me that if one is genuinely and consistently demonstrating unconditional love, a billboard is unnecessary.

Let me not paint in brush strokes too broad to do justice. Certainly, many people who came to this event care deeply about the people around them. Thousands of people were moved from their comfort zones to visit total strangers around the city in order to tell them about the love of God. There is much to be said for that. Surely, there is love behind those actions.

The question is whether that is enough. For those unsuspecting home owners who received a visit from one of the messengers and learned of and received the love of God for the first time, it probably was. But if these disciples of Jesus want to communicate the love of God, there must be more than a simple visit to middle class America with a Gospel tract.

You see, I have a problem with reading a billboard declaring our love for the world and then, as I stated in my previous post, resolutions are introduced that call for actions that speak to the contrary.

As my friend and I continued our conversation last night, we talked of the media coverage of the event and how we knew with certainty that the reporting would either be slanted to make the Convention look as bad as possible or they would focus on the most controversial and “newsworthy.” I don’t fault them for the latter, it is their jobs.

However, what would be more newsworthy than to hear resolutions coming from the floor of the SBC that, instead of running away from the world, were world-engaging in their focus? What would happen if a resolution was introduced and passed that encouraged every Southern Baptist Church to either begin supporting or work together to establish hospices for AIDS patients? What if a resolution were passed encouraging churches to begin developing training initiatives for young people to help them understand their culture and actively engage their world in their schools; to encourage them to get as involved as possible in all aspects of their culture in order to be a witness of the love of God to everyone around them? Would that communicate love to Nashville and the surrounding world?

Or how about this one: a resolution to encourage every church in every part of the country to begin a cultural analysis of their community and to start at least one ministry that reached out to the “least of these” and helped them become the human beings God created them to be. This would be top news because it would be such an unexpected development at the Southern Baptist Convention.

There are many churches all across this land that already do many of these things. What the billboard says is true, but our actions, as a body, fail to communicate that truth. We seem petty, self-centered and concerned only with self-preservation. We must, at all cost, preserve our Christian interests.

Is there a place for voices that look at the world and attempt to point out the dangers of living a life apart from God; the “voices crying out in the wilderness”? Should there be those who sound the warning of cultural fault lines? Should there be those who look at the world and say, this…this right here is dangerous; this is contrary to what is true and these are the consequences that could await you at the end of the path? I really think so. It is certainly what I attempt to do with this blog, but we must not do it unless we are prepared to love (through our actions as well as our words), as loudly as we speak our analyses.

I am guilty. I acknowledge that. I have so often been so defensive in my stance against the changing culture that I have failed to balance that analysis with actions that demonstrate a healthier and God-centered lifestyle. But I am under conviction and looking for ways to make changes.

The Southern Baptist Convention can do the same. We can acknowledge that we, like the Pharisees of old, have been so concerned with preserving our Christian subculture and defense shelters from the world, that we’ve failed to adequately engage the world in such a way that they will know, beyond doubt, that we love them. Then, and only then, might they listen to the Truth that we have to communicate. The cool thing? They will have already heard it.


NOTE:
I only caught part of Richard Land's report on the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, but apparently, there were some good words regarding ministry to homosexual individuals. Read Joe and Steve's post on the subject here.

Labels:

Tuesday, June 21, 2005

Edgar Ray Killen: It's been a long time coming

Word came down today that Edgar Ray Killen, the man accused of murdering three civil rights workers in Mississippi in 1964, was found not guilty of murder but guilty on all counts of man-slaughter, a conviction that will likely land the 80 year-old preacher of hate in the slammer for the rest of his life.

The defense admitted that Killen was a member of the Ku Klux Klan but argued that just because he is a member doesn't make him guilty. Frankly, I think that couldn't be weaker. A person was not in the KKK in the South in the 60's as a part of the Welcome Wagon. Every single member, in my humble opinion, is guilty by association. This was and is an organization of hate who likes to "mask" their hatred in a twisted Christian aberration. Perhaps only one or two actually committed the murders, but the whole Klan is guilty by association.

I am thankful that the people in my home state of Mississippi are working to move past their dark history. It's not easy and is often painful, but it's worth the effort. There is a long way to go, but these continue to be good steps in the right direction.

Related post.

Labels:

Sound the Retreat?

One of the issues on the agenda of the Southern Baptist Convention is the call for Baptists to withdraw their children from public schools that push homosexuality as a valid lifestyle.

I, for one, hope that measure fails miserably and not for any reason that relates to the particular issue or reason mentioned. I don't support this type of action because it continues our weak mantra of "hate-the-sin-not-the-sinner," but fails to demonstrate that any concrete ways. Right now, I'm not buying it any more than the sinner is. If we love the sinner, why are we so anxious to get away from him? If we love the sinner, why are we not preparing our children to be epicenters of love and compassion, planted firmly on the solid rock of God's Truth?

If we are so concerned to isolate our children from things that don't glorify God, then we might as well not stop at homosexuality...and we might as well not stop at public schools. Unfortunately, Christians become so short-sighted that we totally forget what the Bible actually says about such issues...we forget what Jesus' attitude and teaching was. We forget that Jesus was constantly in the midst of people who suffered from all types of symptoms of the great sin disease.

If we want to hate the sin but love the sinner, then let's teach our children what it means to be "salt and light" in the world. Jesus said that his followers are to be salt for the world, providing a preservative to our culture through our love and influence and we are also to be the light of the world, helping to guide fellow sinners to the same source of healing and life that we have found.

We need to shelter our children, not through keeping them out of the world, but providing a buffer of faithful teaching and instruction that will prepare them for the world and protect them from its influence. Scripture tells us that we are to be in the world while not of it. We are to live here, relate here, love here but not get too comfortable here that we look just like it. There are differences; very important differences, but they are not to be the kind of differences that keep us apart. What we are teaching our children by withdrawing them is diametrically opposed to Scripture's teaching for the followers of Christ. Is this really the legacy we want to leave for our kids. Do we really mean to teach them that to be a Christian is a matter of self-preservation, free of risks and danger? Is the Church to be a place of isolation while the world goes to hell?

Scripture goes on to say in Matthew 16 that upon the rock, Christ would build his church and the gates of hell would not prove stronger. Christians need to remember that gates are not an offensive measure, but defensive. The Church is supposed to be on the offensive against the gates of hell (not the people, remember, these are not the crusades) in which case the gates could not stand against the offensive. Christians have nothing to be afraid of. We do not need to sound retreat, but instead, in full confidence of God's power,
fully engage the culture with the love and compassion that demonstrates that, no, we don't approve of the sin, but we really do love the one, like us, who commits sin.

NOTE: The purpose of this blog has always been that of cultural commentary. If you are interested in more in-depth blogging on the activities of the convention itself, I point you to the guys at the SBC Emerging Leaders blog, who I enjoyed having lunch and hanging out with a little today, at our make-shift "blog central" in the exhibition hall (below).

Labels:

Monday, June 20, 2005

A Worthy Mission

Yesterday, I did what you're never supposed to do: I watched a movie while I drove to Nashville. Yes, I know, it's probably worse than driving with a cell phone. But, you know, an in-flight movie always makes the time pass so much faster. I had my computer set up on the right seat and watched "Seabiscuit." I don't remember much about the drive.

I do, however, remember much about that movie and, being the second time I've watched it, found it again so moving. What a great flick. There is so much truth in that story that I was overwhelmed as I drove.

The theme of the movie becomes evident early on, but is clearly articulated when C.S. Howard is talking to Tom Smith about becoming the trainer of his not-yet-purchased race horse. After Howard asks Tom why he is taking care of and trying to heal a lame horse that is standing nearby with a bandage around his leg, Tom tells him, "Because I can." He further explains that "you don't throw away a whole life just because it's banged up a little bit." Wow, what a great line...what a great truth.

As I reflected on that throughout the rest of the movie, I was deeply moved by the weight of that truth. We see Howard, who had lost his son in an accident and his wife, who left him because she couldn't cope with their son's death, become a catalyst in the redemption process of "a horse that's too small,[and] a jockey that's too big" as well as everyone else with whom he came in contact who were affected by the Great Depression...people used, abused and cast aside as worthless.

We get a glimpse into that universal truth that people matter, regardless of their circumstances, their past, their socio-economic position, their color, their ideals. We are too often prepared to throw away whole lives when they get banged up a little . We fail to see the value in even one precious soul; a soul created by a holy and loving God.

I'm talking about all kinds of people: the homeless man who walks the street asking for spare change that never got the real shot he needed because the money was never there for education or who became the slave of alcohol or drugs based on bad choices and poor judgment; the unborn child who won't get a shot at life because her teenage mother and father didn't take into consideration the results of their brief moment of pleasure and are not willing to sacrifice their own dreams in order to live up to their responsibility; the victim of AIDS whose lifestyle has left him a thin, weak shell of a man and has no chance of recovery, painfully wasting away day by day; the elderly woman whose husband has long since passed and whose family is too busy with lives of their own to even spend a couple of hours a week at the nursing home where she spends the remaining years of existence alone and isolated, watching the outside world pass through the window of a lonely room.

We throw these people away. We cast them aside. We give them lip-service or talk about what a pity it is or we justify why we think the way we do. Well, I'm a follower of Jesus and those are things He would never do. He came and loved every one of these people with an active love; a love that says, "You know, you messed up; you got a bad break; you didn't have much of a chance...but I love." He reached down in the dirt and picked people up and said to them with his actions, "You matter." He didn't justify or condone their lifestyles or poor judgment, or their sin. He called them to change but helped them out of their condition, offering them new life and new hope...free of charge. He impacted every person He came in contact with. People of all stripes and walks of life need to know they matter. I know I do and there's not a soul with breath in his nostrils who feels any differently. It's how we are made.

I spent a couple of hours yesterday in a meeting of young leaders of the Southern Baptist Convention here in Nashville. We heard people talking about where Southern Baptists have been and where we need to go. As I'm sure you know, we're known for a lot of things, most of them not positive. We're known for our in-fighting, our cold and heartless dogmatism, our intolerance, our lack of compassion. At least, these are the impressions most of the population has when asked what they think of us. In many ways, they are right. Our focus has been skewed and we have not backed up our fight for truth and sound doctrine with actions of love and compassion or a concern for justice for all people.

Yesterday, we talked about the next generation of upcoming Southern Baptists and what was important. We talked about "the mission." What mission? The mission of Christ to love a world that gets thrown aside when life gets a little banged up. We talked about loving all kinds of people with an unconditional love that lets them know that they are special to the One who died to demonstrate that love and that He has a future for them. We want to get away from what we have been and look to a future that stands on the Truth of Scripture, but does it in such a way that people of all walks of life experience the compassion and forgiveness of a loving God and are offered a hand up out of their bad luck, or bad choices, or bad whatever.

Can we do it? Man, I don't know. It's a whole lot of people coming from a bunch of different directions carrying a whole lot of baggage just like everybody else. But I can tell you this: there are a bunch more people than there ever have been wanting to see it happen. There are people who want to see this massive denominational "machine," as it has been described, become an agent of change in a society that needs a ton of love and compassion without strings attached. We love not for what we can get, but simply because that's what people need and that's what Jesus is about. It's about the mission.

Seabiscuit demonstrated that truth in a beautiful way on the screen. I hope I can demonstrate it in reality. I hope we all can.

Labels:

Sunday, June 19, 2005

Happy Father's Day

The Doofus Dad: Where did we fathers go wrong?

HT: Instapundit

Labels:

Saturday, June 18, 2005

Heading to Nashville

Tomorrow I leave for the annual Southern Baptist Convention to be held this year in Nashville, Tennessee. I will be attending the Young Leaders meeting tomorrow and probably the Pastors Conference tomorrow night, then the actual convention on Tuesday and Wednesday. I am planning on blogging while I'm there.

Labels:

Friday, June 17, 2005

PETA Workers Charged With Animal Cruelty

How much more ironic could this be?
Two employees of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals have been charged with animal cruelty after dumping dead dogs and cats in a shopping center garbage bin, police said.
Read full story here.

Labels:

Durbin over the top

On Tuesday night, U.S. Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill) compared the actions of the U.S. Military at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba to "torture at the hands of Nazis, Soviet gulags and even Cambodian mass murderer Pol Pot." I find this charge so absolutely ludicrous that it barely deserves intelligent comment.

I am not at all for inhumane treatment of anyone, though tough forms of interrogation are often required to get vitally important, life-saving information;
information that can be vital to the safety of the people not only of this country, but, literally, of the world. Please remember, we're not talking about the treatment of innocent people, but people who have intent to do harm and who have little or no regard for human life themselves (people who would not be in the situation they are in had they not involved themselves with murderous campaigns).

However, we certainly must remember that these are people...they are human beings and I would not go so far as to say that there may very well be practices that should be looked into and even discontinued, but it is absolutely absurd to compare the men and women of U.S. Military or any of the coalition forces with the worst of the murderous tyrants in the world. It was absolutely irresponsible to speak of the people who put their lives on the line every day in such a manner. They don't deserve it.

Here is the basis upon which Durbin draws his comparisons:
On one occasion, the air conditioning had been turned down so far and the temperature was so cold in the room, that the barefooted detainee was shaking with cold. ... On another occasion, the [air conditioner] had been turned off, making the temperature in the unventilated room well over 100 degrees. The detainee was almost unconscious on the floor, with a pile of hair next to him. He had apparently been literally pulling his hair out throughout the night. On another occasion, not only was the temperature unbearably hot, but extremely loud rap music was being played in the room, and had been since the day before, with the detainee chained hand and foot in the fetal position on the tile floor.
Were the detainees uncomfortable? I'm sure they were. Extremely uncomfortable? I'm sure I would be. Miserable? Most likely. But were their tongues cut out? Were they starved to death and dragged off to mass graves? Were they beaten beyond recognition and left to die? Shot at point blank range while they begged for their lives? Were they submitted to electric shock via the genitals, eyes gouged out, or limbs severed? Were their heads sawed off with machetes? I hope you can see the absurdity of such comparisons.

Durbin, nor anyone else, regardless of how little they dislike what is happening in Gitmo or at any other military detention center, has a basis upon which these types of thoughtless charges can rightfully be made. It is a case of mindless, acerbic rhetoric.

There is plenty of room for disagreement among good folk regarding the "rightness" of this war, the decisions of George Bush and the Administration, or just about anything. There is, however, little room for this kind of slander. Whatever his reasons, be they honorable or otherwise, Durbin's words demonstrate a problem all too common among politicians: loose tongues guided by poor choices in order to mindlessly support partisan agendas. Unfortunately, this often leads to more problems and deeper divides.

UPDATE: [6-26-05] See video of Senator Dubin's apology on the floor of the Senate. HT: Ian Schwartz of Oz (Ian has no link at present).

Labels:

Thursday, June 16, 2005

Words can't express

For those of you who remember this post from a few of weeks ago, you'll remember my disgust at the fact that a man convicted of rape was allowed to foster parent up to fifty children.

I actually have a story here that tops it: One man suspected of molesting up to 36,000 children. I find it so absolutely enraging, I'm just going to let you read it if you haven't already.

Labels:

Wednesday, June 15, 2005

Legal Guide for Bloggers

If you blog, you should read this. It's a guide to help you understand what laws may apply to what you write. Thanks to Steve McCoy over at Reformissionary for the tip.

Labels:

Tuesday, June 14, 2005

Espresso Shots [5-14-05]

A Senate Apology on Lynching

Yesterday, the U.S. Senate passed a non-binding measure issuing an apology to the nation for failing to eliminate the brutal practice of lynching during the tumultuous years following the end of slavery.
The U.S. Senate last night approved a resolution apologizing for its failure to enact federal anti-lynching legislation decades ago, marking the first time the body has apologized for the nation's treatment of African Americans.

One-hundred and five years after the first anti-lynching bill was proposed by a black congressman, senators approved by a voice vote Resolution 39, which called for the lawmakers to apologize to lynching victims, survivors and their descendants, several of whom watched from the gallery.
This is certainly a positive development that is a necessary part of the healing process of this country. Though I've heard nothing from Senators Thad Cochran or Trent Lott regarding reasons for their withholding their names as co-sponsors of this resolution, I'm disappointed that the two Senators from my home state did not take the opportunity to voice support.
Missing from that list were senators from the state that reported the most lynching incidents: Mississippi Republicans Trent Lott and Thad Cochran.
Mississippi played such an ugly part in this reprehensible drama, I can't imagine why these senators did not take the opportunity to demonstrate and acknowledge that past and lead the state in its continued desire for change.
Years ago, African Americans were being beaten and hung, and the people who had the power to do something about it were afraid to do anything or just didn't," [Simeon] Wright said. "Now, their sons and daughters realize how wrong they were, and they want to do something. The apology is appropriate. It was a long time coming, but it is here.
Simeon Wright is the cousin of Emmett Till, who was murdered at the age of 14 in Mississippi for whistling at the wife of a white store owner. That case is being reopened for investigation. As the Assistant DA for Hinds County, Mississippi, Bobby DeLaughter, who led the conviction of the murder of Medgar Evers, was quoted as saying, "It's never too late to do the right thing." I couldn't agree more.

Full story from the Washington Post



Another Mississippi Murder Case Re-opened


In a related story, jury selection for 80 year old Klansman, Edgar Ray Killen, is underway in Mississippi. Similar to the Medgar Evers case, in which Byron DeLaBeckwith was convicted of murdering the civil rights leader, the case against Killen is being re-opened in relation to the killings of three voter registration volunteers in Neshoba County.
The case against the 80-year-old Killen represents Mississippi's latest attempt to deal with unfinished business from the...Civil Rights Act of 1964. The case was dramatized in the 1988 movie "Mississippi Burning."
It's always uncertain as to whether a conviction can be obtained after so much time has passed, especially when it is so important to conclusively identify and convict the guilty party rather than simply getting a conviction for the sole purpose of "healing." It appears, however, that the State has a pretty good case.
Killen was tried along with several others in 1967 on federal charges of violating the victims' civil rights. The all-white jury deadlocked in Killen's case, but seven others were convicted. None served more than six years. Killen is the only person ever indicted on state murder charges in the case.
Full story here.

On the other hand, justice isn't always blind

So called "King of Pop," Michael Jackson, was acquitted on all 10 charges related to child molestation brought against him during his trial that ended yesterday. Though I tried to follow this case as little as possible, it appears that Jackson's celebrity status may have played a part in his acquittal. As in the cases against O.J. Simpson and Robert Blake, Jackson more than likely received a life-saving gift by that jury. But that's our justice system...

...case closed.

Do you want to look a little older? Here's how...

According to a recent study reported in Life Style Extra, obesity can add up to nine years to your appearance. Want even better news? Smoke and you add another 4.5. How about that? You can look a combined thirteen and a half years older than you really are! Great, huh?!

Being obese can age people by up to nine years - while smokers look four-and-a-half years older than they really are, a new study shows.

And getting through 20 cigarettes a day for 40 years can put almost seven-and-a-half years on you, the researchers found.

Obesity and smoking are important risk factors for many age-related diseases but it is the first time they have been found to make people "biologically older".
So, next time you order that "biggie" size value meal while puffing on a cancer stick, think of the positives: assuming you don't die early of lung disease or heart failure, if they don't ask for identification, you may be able to get the senior discount.

Labels:

Monday, June 13, 2005

Mike Tyson retires: Best sporting news of the weekend.

Next to the victory of Afleet Alex at the 137th Belmont Stakes, this has got to be some of the best news in sports. Finally, the tumultuous career of Mike Tyson came to an end over the weekend after losing yet another heavy weight fight. All I can say is it's about time.

The man who personifies bad sportsmanship gave up the ship at the end of the sixth round from the stool. This, of course, came after he attempted to end the fight (knowing he couldn't win any other way) by head-butting his opponent, Irish fighter Kevin McBride, himself considered an underwhelming fighter.

The head butt (which resulted in Tyson being knocked down into the ropes...see exhibit A to the right) came after Tyson apparently tried to break the arm of McBride earlier in the bout. This purely "Tysonesque" moment was the last show of unsportsmanlike conduct of his two-bit career.

Great boxer? At one point years ago, without a doubt. Great athlete? Uh-uh. The mark of a great athlete always has and always will be (I hope!) not only the level of success achieved within their given sport, but also the level of success they maintain as a human being. Not that beating the brains out of another guy while your own gray matter is being pounded into dog food, in my mind, is the high point of sport, but at least there are those names within the sport that bring a high level of class. People like George Foreman and Evander Holyfield, for example, demonstrate what sportsmanlike conduct for a champion is all about. Maintaining the balance between being at the pinnacle of your sport while maintaining a level of civility and class differentiates the champs from the chumps.


So, happy retirement, Mike...and don't let the door hit you in the butt on the way out.

Labels:

Rudy! Rudy! Rudy!