THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED IN THIS BLOG DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF ALL CONTRIBUTORS AND EACH TEAM MEMBER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FACTS AND OPINIONS CONTAINED IN HIS POST.


CLICK FLAGS FOR PAGE TRANSLATION OPTIONS

  Google  
           Search ESPRESSO ROAST Search WWW

Monday, September 12, 2005

Was the Response to Katrina Really as Bad as Reported?

Columnist Jack Kelly, national security writer for the Post-Gazette and The Blade of Toledo, Ohio, offers an interesting perspective on the federal response to hurricane Katrina. Kelly reports that Jason van Steenwyk, a Florida Army National Guardsman who has been mobilized six times for hurricane relief, considers the relief after Katrina actually "faster than Hugo, faster than Andrew, faster than Iniki, faster than Francine and Jeanne."

Kelly takes exception to the accusatory stance taken by many in the MSM when, according to him, they clearly do not have all of their facts straight:
Journalists who are long on opinions and short on knowledge have no idea what is involved in moving hundreds of tons of relief supplies into an area the size of England in which power lines are down, telecommunications are out, no gasoline is available, bridges are damaged, roads and airports are covered with debris, and apparently have little interest in finding out.

So they libel as a "national disgrace" the most monumental and successful disaster relief operation in world history.

The entire article by Kelly is worth reading as he quotes a former Air Force logistics officer who puts this particular logistical nightmare into perspective:

We do not yet have teleporter or replicator technology like you saw on 'Star Trek' in college between hookah hits and waiting to pick up your worthless communications degree while the grown-ups actually engaged in the recovery effort were studying engineering.

"The United States military can wipe out the Taliban and the Iraqi Republican Guard far more swiftly than they can bring 3 million Swanson dinners to an underwater city through an area the size of Great Britain which has no power, no working ports or airports, and a devastated and impassable road network.

"You cannot speed recovery and relief efforts up by prepositioning assets (in the affected areas) since the assets are endangered by the very storm which destroyed the region.

The fact is, nobody, from the governors of LA or MS, to the mayor of New Orleans, to the leaders within the federal government, wanted to see a single soul die in this storm. Much has been done by all involved and I think that is commendable. Certainly, those in authority will be able to think of things they wish they would have done differently, but that is always the case when tragedy strikes, regardless of who is in charge, their political affiliation, race, national origin, gender...you get the picture.

I'm sure there is plenty of blame to go around, as well, as mistakes seemed to have been made in just about every area. There must be accounting of what is happening so the same mistakes will not be made again. It must, however, be done free of personal or political agendas.

Labels:

2 Comments:

Blogger Rick said...

evidently president Bush thinks it was as bad as others think it was, since he issued an apology today, had Brown removed and allowed him to resign.

Tuesday, September 13, 2005 3:55:00 PM  
Blogger DAVID C. PRICE said...

You're right about those things, though honestly, I'm not certain those moves weren't political attempts to try and shore up abysmal poll numbers regarding this natural disaster. It doesn't matter what the facts are...perception is reality and, therefore, that is what has to be addressed. Funny thing is, based on political history, an apology will probably work.

Tuesday, September 13, 2005 4:03:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Pearcey Report

My Ecosystem Details

© 2007 Espresso Roast Blog - All Rights Reserved